You have one new document pending review marked as high importance.
Access new file
Accessing Document E-5647-Ω…
From the desk of the Ethics Committee.
Following events brought to our attention surrounding SCP-5647 and Procedure 5647-Ω, we have determined it necessary to review and amend our current rulings regarding said anomaly.
Our inquiry highlighted the following:
Our findings as detailed above have led us to defer to the Foundation's prime directive: we maintain normalcy. Whilst the flow of time is an anomaly, it is so integral to our experience as humans that it ought not to be interfered with.
Rulings
- Procedure 5647-Ω is hereby decommissioned. Although it has the potential to avert catastrophe, Procedure 5647-Ω has too much potential to be misused, which is only further compounded by its completely untraceable nature.
- SCP-5647 is to be reclassified as Archon.1
Regards,
The Ethics Committee.
…
Access SCiPNET
…
To: The Ethics Committee
From: O5-6
Subject: Procedure 5647-Ω appeal
Ethics Committee,
I don't mean in this appeal to overstep into your jurisdiction, nor do I mean to request that you blatantly ignore the points you made in your inquiry. What I mean to do here, is to establish the case for Procedure 5647-Ω which I believe wasn't given the proper light of day.
Procedure 5647-Ω has not just the capability to avert catastrophe, but it has already done so. Whilst I can tell this was considered, I think it was brushed aside too quickly. Let me be clear, I fully agree that reliance on, or misuse of, Procedure 5647-Ω would be horrible. I also agree that it does not negate moral consequences as some have suggested.
However, the reason we commissioned Procedure 5647-Ω in the first place was because it was necessary. We can't foresee every danger, nor secure every anomaly, nor keep everyone safe. We have always been in a position where the best we can do is make it unlikely that the worst might happen. Procedure 5647-Ω changes this. With it, we could avert any catastrophe, contain any anomaly, keep anyone safe.
I understand that the Foundation's prime directive is to maintain normalcy, but the Ethics Committee is different. Your job is not the same as ours. Yours is to be empathetic, to be moral, to be human. And so here I give you this choice: you can maintain normalcy, or you can strive to create something better.
Regards,
-O5-6
…
Message sent.
Logout
Shutting down systems…
Goodbye O5-6.