News for June, 2021

Hello everyone! This is WhiteGuard speaking. I was a reporter until recently, it is August now, and I have been given the role of editor of Site News. From all on the Site News team, we apologize for the delay. The change in management and everyone being busy caused delays in everything. I am however happy to announce that the July edition of the Site News will be out very soon with a brand new team, brand new sections and content, and a brand new look and format. Thank you so much for reading Site News. Hopefully starting with the July edition with our revamp of Site News we can develop something that even more people will enjoy reading!
We will feature a lot more original content in addition to overhauling our older sections. These new ideas include some writers' opinion pieces, broader interviews, a revamped art section, and more! Additionally, if YOU, the reader, have any suggestions for things you would like to see in a monthly Site News, please feel free to contact me directly. Much of the below edition has been worked on over a number of months and so we decided to finish this one up in the old style and do a fresh start with our July edition. While you wait for the new and revamped July Site News, feel free to read and check out this final edition of the Site News with this format. Also, please give props to Elenee Fishtruck, a new member of the team, who created the editorial for this June edition!

This is a series showing off news from the site, articles from the past month1, and fan-content for you to check out and discover! Be sure to leave a comment with your thoughts!

DISCLAIMER: Some of the contents of the news will be the opinions of individuals and are not necessarily representative of staff as a whole. If you take issue with the contents, feel free to reach out to the editor(s) and they will review the contents to see if there should be any edits made. Thank you for your understanding.

From the Editorial Desk

In 2011, an IRC chat operator kicked a user for saying "/v/ is such a pile of insecure one-upping f*ggotry" in conversation, and soon 24-hour banned them for fighting the decision. While the latter action received little pushback per standard policy on sarcastic attitude towards ops, the former action spurred debate on allowing slurs in #site19. No one actively promoted homophobia or other bigotry, but the common opinion excused slurs given they're "not a harmful slur" or "not directed at anyone", and "we're [not] losing much should [someone offended by casual slur usage] leave in a huff of butthurt".

This came to a head when a user used the same word in conversation, and the 05 thread represented a similar reaction. An admin fiat-allowed their usage, telling dissenters "you may tender your resignation", and a moderator cried "CENSORSHIP IS NOT OKAY, EVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES". "By attempting to protect the interests of a group of people, you are imposing your will upon another and limiting their capacity to express themselves," they said.

That is, expressing themselves by casually using slurs.

Strength, in the internet's early days, constituted sucking up and lifting your chin at every vile thing you see. It's the internet, after all. One should have expected such heinous occurrences or messages, words and phrases that hurt. "That is a damn fool thing to get offended by on the internet." Strength, then, represented hiding emotion, excusing vitriol under "comedic" or "nonharmful" pretenses. Attempting to change meant "hypocrisy in the extreme" in the face of the early internet. Clearly this is how strength will be forevermore defined.

3 years later…

Similar arguments and actions emerge in another thread on slurs. Another admin attempts fiating certain actions without consulting others, stating they "will consider [snark against their decision] the next time promotions are made", though this admin smartly retracts their fiat once receiving such snark. Even another argument on censorship, calling it "a slippery slope" when deciding what to ban, and once again citing that definition of strength. "It's the internet."

Yet this does not form the predominant voice. While still not fully modern, the consensus trails towards a brighter and more considerate future. Maybe slur usage is bad. The thread does not have a definitive conclusion, nor does it need one.

I think it is clear who won the battle.

Strength changed. Strength doesn't mean blindly accepting what goes on around you because it's "the status quo" or "how it always was" or "the internet". Strength isn't letting old habits continue for the sake of old habits. Strength is standing against those traditions. Strength is being yourself when facing hardship. Strength is making active efforts to change the rules, do the right thing, help your fellow human. Strength is taking pride in what you know is moral and just. With strength, with pride, you can make a community change.

While, in our internet bubble, acceptance becomes much more common, such trends do not continue elsewhere, at times regressing. Strength continues to mean repression and oppression in those spaces. Perhaps, just like the forebears in 2011 and 2014, users can take their strength past the internet, into spaces that need it, and transform definitions. The work and time it requires pays off eventually, and everyone will feel all the more prideful for it.

Happy belated Pride, everyone.





Q&A:

Q: Can I replace a blurb that you wrote for one of my articles with my own? I'm not satisfied with it.

A: Absolutely. You will always have that option at any point.

Q: I noticed an error/typo/incorrect information and wish to correct it. May I?

A: Sure! If the changes are not limited to your own article(s) and/or are substantial changes across multiple entries, you should post in that month's discussion page and then make the changes.

Q: I wrote an article and it seems to have stuck. Can I send a blurb of mine to one of the reporters?

A: Yup! It's much easier if you come to us about it, and it gives you the control over what you want shown on the news page.


Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License