Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »

Click on "Safety Procedures". First image says "ESTABLSISH".

ALERT! Typo. JARRING BEEP! by 8O8O, 21 Apr 2026 07:26

Im not sure what u mean, but i wrote it in docs and copied it here.


im smarter and dumber than you think. don't estimate me.

I expressed most of my thoughts in crit, but man, this is something special. The added logo is very cool and ties everything together. Really looking forward to reading and maybe writing more of this setting

+1 by poltatherianpoltatherian, 21 Apr 2026 06:31

I really like this article and how you added the weather map at the start. It's a very cool add-on and all the weather information is pretty up to par. I really enjoyed this and will re-read this over and over.


Dir.Ethan

+1 by DirEthanDirEthan, 21 Apr 2026 06:15

I'm not quite sure what you're asking about here. If you would like to submit material to the SCP wiki, why wouldn't you need to write it yourself?

Re: Do we have to write a story? by ZynZyn, 21 Apr 2026 06:09

The idea, themes, story and the above summary were written by me.

Can you explain why your concept summary has a lot of typical AI tells, such as the sentence pattern, "They do not correct or judge; they simply verbalize these unspoken or ignored truths."?

Also, why does your Central Narrative section not actually contain any story content, despite the prompt being, "The overall story that your article intends to tell."?

Noting that the author's membership has been revoked, and they have been issued a permanent ban from the site, due to posting AI-generated material. Thank you to everyone in the discussion who brought this to attention!

Also, witnessing for summary deletion.

Admin Post - Info - Open by ZynZyn, 21 Apr 2026 05:56

Noting that the author's membership has been revoked, and they have been issued a permanent ban from the site, due to posting AI-generated material.

Also, witnessing for summary deletion.

Admin Post - Info - Open by ZynZyn, 21 Apr 2026 05:55

Noting that the author's membership has been revoked, and they have been issued a permanent ban from the site, due to posting AI-generated material.

Also, witnessing for summary deletion.

Admin Post - Info - Open by ZynZyn, 21 Apr 2026 05:54

Noting that the author's membership has been revoked, and they have been issued a permanent ban from the site, due to posting AI-generated material.

Also, witnessing for summary deletion.

Admin Post - Info - Open by ZynZyn, 21 Apr 2026 05:53

Please note that this thread is not for seeking feedback; if you are looking for general advice about the writing process, please create a new thread in this forum category: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/c-891087/help:questions-desk

Author, please mind the Ideas Critique required reading, which states that you should not post a sandbox link unless a reviewer specifically asks to read a full draft. This is to encourage authors to develop their summarization skills for discussing and editing core aspects of their material with reviewers.

For some tips on remaining brief when summarizing, consider looking at this thread: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-13369776/how-do-i-remain-brief-when-writing-an-scp-concept or you can also read this page on filling out the concept review template: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/essay-on-communicating-ideas

Critique Team - Captain Post by ZynZyn, 21 Apr 2026 05:46

Author, per the greenlighting policy: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-10629348/new-draft-forum-policies first-time authors seeking draft critique in the forums must get their concept(s) greenlighted in the Ideas Critique forum, IRC chatrooms, and/or official Discord.

Please first go to the Ideas forum or the chat, give a quick summary (for the Ideas forum, please follow the instructions in the required reading thread) of the concept you want to write up (don't link the draft unless someone requests it).

During the conceptualization stage, reviewers can let you know if something similar already exists on the site, and/or tell you if there is anything that would prevent them from wanting to read a full draft. These issues are more effectively addressed earlier on in the writing process.

If you have already received two greenlights, please note from whom and where you received them. If you would like to skip the greenlighting process, you can use the IRC chatrooms for draft reviews.

Critique Team - Captain Post by ZynZyn, 21 Apr 2026 05:46

not going to discuss the potential discriminatory content because I’m not above making offensive jokes myself but they really, really have to land to get away with it. the jokes in this do not land - the closest anything gets is that line about the pope (yes, rick and morty joke but it’s mildly amusing that the foundation seem to be unaware of rick and morty) but then it’s immediately ruined by the flying spaghetti monster dragging me all the way back to 2016 - which is the biggest issue with the article. everything feels incredibly dated (and honestly most of it wouldn’t have been particularly funny even back in 2016) with the occasional modern day reference forced in

if im being honest, i think this concept is nearly unworkable and you’re not going to be able to fix its issues with little edits - if you’re super attached to this concept I would recommend deleting the article and essentially rewriting it from the ground up

by gee0765gee0765, 21 Apr 2026 05:42

Its_WheffleIts_Wheffle, you are not listed as the author of the page. JackEater351JackEater351 originally posted this article.

Are you co-authors? If so, please ask the original author to note as such.

If you are using two accounts, please note that this is not permitted by the SCP wiki; you would need to choose one account to retain membership on and the other will be issued a ban.

bro by SomeonePringles1SomeonePringles1, 21 Apr 2026 04:54

I plan on overhauling how the infected operate. Additionally I’m gonna try and use I think the table view module in order to have each section appear on its own.

I've seen you post in this exact slot a few times now and each time I've watched it get deleted. It needs to be said that you should really work on your posts in the Sandbox Wiki and get it properly critiqued before putting it onto the main site.

Another thing to note, as with most of the SCP articles on site, they are clinical documents used in world for the Foundation Staff to know how to contain an object. The SCP you have written does not tell me anything about the object, why it's semi-neutralized, there is no clinical tone and this reads more like a tale than an SCP.

Please seek critique, all the best in your writing journey.

-1 by Dr K ParkerDr K Parker, 21 Apr 2026 04:23

you did this not me


bloop

Re: +1 by Fish^12Fish^12, 21 Apr 2026 04:20

What the hell


+1 by TroutMaskReplicaTroutMaskReplica, 21 Apr 2026 03:22
page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License