Ah, L.S. has a fantastic way of writing. Very poetic.
Who is the aforementioned Black Surt? I thought at first that she was referring to the devil, but I could only find references to a Norse mythological figure.
Security Breach Incident X23 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» Security Breach Incident X23
This is the discussion related to the wiki page Security Breach Incident X23.
If I had to guess, the reference is to said Norse mythological figure. At Ragnarok, Surtr (also rendered Surt, Surtur) would incinerate the world. That fits the reference to "cleansing fire".
I honestly just read that as "You hide behind guns and broccoli…"
You know, I've always wondered if the Serpent's Hand is just the SCP-rights version of the ALF, except with a fondness for pretentious mystical bullshit.
That's probably a little true in a way that'd make the Serpent's Hand members scratch their head a little and then start talking about Lincoln and slavery or something.
I like the editing you made to the article. It makes it seem much more like a summery of the incident for the archives. However, I think the P.S. should be kept. True, it helps make it seem more serious and official, but keeping it makes the note seem less like propaganda or fanatic babble, and more like poetic, even religious, advice. It is because in conjunction with SCP-507, L.S. appears much more like a major player with knowledge the Foundation doesn't have than just a skilled agent. It plays up the mystery of the incident.
Agreed. I preferred it pre edit.
This has been one of my favorite pieces on the wiki for a long time.
oh, hum, I don't think I mean meant to remove the PS. I think I must have chopped it out during copy-pasting, as I'm prone to do.
apparently x and a random number aren't so random after all.
Reminds me a little of the cult in the Thief games, the one opposed to the Hammerites.
(account deleted)How concerned should I be that I think I would rather side with The Serpent's Hand than with the SCP Foundation?
Not at all, really
Just as the Foundation is not the almighty repository for all things paranormal-related, its enemies are not the four horsemen of the apocalypse, and they do have a point: most humanoid SCPs are well, HUMANS with FEELINGS and all that jazz, so, you know, keeping them in a cell just because they can travel through pictures or some shit like that is really cruel, but that's what the Big F does: Secure, Contain and Protect
Actually, if I was given a choice in real-life, I'd probably join AWCY? because motherfucking art on a whole new level, man
(What if I started calling the Foundation "the Big F" from now on [How To Get Banned In A Single Post By SCP Forum User Tiefling])
I find myself convinced that I know the identity of the mysterious L.S.. The reference to Surtr, the ease of his theft and infiltration, and the faintly mocking tone of his letter all lead me to deduce that L.S. is…
Loki. Also known as Loki Scar-lip, Loki Sky-Walker, and Lie-Smith.
Seems a bit too silly to be connected with the parent SCP page.
/forum/t-98590/security-breach-incident-x23#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
