the name needs to be SCP-400
you cant have it be named
SCP-400-ARC / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-400-ARC
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-400-ARC.
Actually, so long as all external links are SCP-400, it's fine if the page has a title. Also, I'm not sure how to revert it to a different title without changing the address…
You know, I keep wondering one thing: how does a containment breach occur on a non-mobile scp??
That is left to your imagination. Think about the last part.
[04:06:13] Phone rings.
[04:07:52] Door guard enters containment area.
[04:07:55] Guard enters phone box.
[04:07:57] Guard answers phone.
[04:07:59] Guard gives his name, rank, and security clearance and asks caller for identification.
[04:08:01] Guard gets odd look on his face, calls for superior
[04:08:02] Guard hands phone to superior, reporting "Here, it's for you."
[04:08:03] Superior answers phone, and gives name, rank, and security clearance.
[04:08:05] Superior speaks into phone, saying "Sorry, we're not interested, and this number is on the do-not-call list."
[04:08:06] Overhead light in containment area fails. Screaming is heard, followed shortly by a wet popping noise.
[04:08:12] Containment failure occurs.
[04:08:13] Containment failure occurs on SCP-███, SCP-███, SCP-████, and [DATA EXPUNGED]
[04:08:28] SCP-████ comes into contact with [DATA EXPUNGED].
[04:08:29] [DATA EXPUNGED]
[04:08:37] Facility locked down. All staff on site terminated.
(account deleted)Maybe, before using it to call mythological figures was ruled not allowed, there could be a previous testing log where they listed mythological figures they called, and what happened?
SCP-████ comes into contact with [DATA EXPUNGED].
… Dead… Bodies?
This SCP…comes close to being interesting with the log, but in the end fails to do anything remotely interesting. I liked this when I first joined, but now….eugh.
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
[04:08:37] Facility locked down. All staff on site terminated.
All of them? For what?
Was about to say.
I'm assuming they meant killed by the containment breach(es), not flat-out murdered by high-command or whatever for some arbitrary reason.
It says terminated rather than KIA or somesuch, plus given that the article is from archaic old days when staff were killed for just about anything it's most likely that they were all deliberately executed by the Foundation.
I figured it was one of those cases where they had to detonate the on-site…erm…counter-apocolypse devices (i.e. nuclear bombs, toxic gas canisters, etc.), to put a stop to everything that was breaking out of containment, and the staff died in the process. Or something like that. In other words, that they were killed, not for being staff on the site, but as collateral damage.
/forum/t-77823/scp-400-arc#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
