I dislike in-jokes being made into SCPs. It encourages people to coast with subpar articles because the "OMG someone actually did that!1!" reaction tends to be the most salient part of the piece, rather than any inherent interest or storytelling. It also makes the SCP experience more insular for newer users and thus limits our audience.
Additionally, I dislike permanent memorials to bad articles so they can be made fun of forever. This place is harsh and unsparing in its criticism, as it should be. But stuff like this crosses the line into petty meanness and contempt, IMO.
This particular article lacks any sort of interest to me. It's an overly complex version of random thing what does a random thing. I guess there's a "is the copy really the person" kind of thing going on in there, but it could have been handled far better without the extraneous goofiness. So really, this is pretty much riding the Soulberg thing almost entirely. For the reasons outlined above, that engenders my emphatic downvote.
(account deleted)
