And here's the last part of the Professor's lecture… left uncompleted.
Mostly because I'm looking for questions to answer!
Post your questions in the discussion page, and I will get back to them and include them in the final version of the Tale.
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» Transcript of a lecture given by Professor ████████████: Conclusion, Q and A
This is the discussion related to the wiki page Transcript of a lecture given by Professor ████████████: Conclusion, Q and A.
… oh. Ooooooh okay. : D
From the comment of the previous transcript, and involving Aspects (Pitch) and rituals:
I was thinking about murders and carvings and the like, but I should have thought about sex too… also, I wonder if Sharp and Flat can be tied to sex with protection, or in vitro fertilization.
As I come up with other questions, I'll pose them. Again, upvoted. : 3
How much of the site content do you think you can apply this to? Seeing as we are influenced by pop-culture and other articles on the site, most of the articles dealing with magic can probably be defined in GOC terms. But what about the parts that can't (Especially if they are popular/noteworthy articles)
(account deleted)Question:
Why use blood? Couldn't you just get some jugs of milk at a supermarket if you need EVE?
Have there been any attempts to utilize type greens in the same way that type blues are employed? Or has it always been recognized as too dangerous to consider?
Is the Coalition less squeamish about using anomalous means than the Foundation is? I mean, with the GOC being* "destroy all anomalies" while the Foundation is "lock it up, and learn all we can from it", I would not have expected the former group to be one that regularly practices witchcraft.
If the Coalition had to look at itself as a parathreat, what threat level would it be at? What would it take for it to grow a threat level?
*or having been
"Where is the point at which thaumatology becomes inefficient and impractical when compared with technology, even 0+ technology? I mean… I'm thinking about the previous example involving a bus ride and/or a massive orgy, it is clearly impractical. Does magic require more effort than what it's worth for important material changes?"
"Is information gathering easier and cleaner than reality bending? I heard of a Type Blue agent using a subject's hair to determine their relative position within an unmapped forest area. Can that have a backlash, or does it have less negative consequences?"
"Sorry, Sir, I just wanted to thank you for a wonderful presentation and ask you… is there any chance whatsoever that religious groups built around certain miracles or portents are actually the inheritors of Type Green or Type Blue founders? Do we have evidence on the matter?"
"I'm not sure I got that right a couple of hours back, sorry. Is a Type Red able to bend reality in any way?"
"For how long can Aspect Radiation related to a Blue event remain in the environment?"
If one part affects the whole, couldn't you use any object to change the nature of the entire universe?
What's the difference between a type black and a type ex machina?
Are there any types of thaumaturgical resources other than vital energy?
Has anyone ever tried to use thaumaturgy to deal with global issues like war and hunger? And if so, how come they never worked?
Whenever I imagine magic, I think of old guys in robes, holding staves and wands and stuff like that. Did you guys ever use any of that stuff?
There was a question here, but it was stupid.
*quietly squees*
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
/forum/t-769421/transcript-of-a-lecture-given-by-professor:conclusion-q-and#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
