I love the concept, it's very unique. There's not much I could say about it except that I thoroughly enjoyed it.
+1
SCP-1624 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-1624
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-1624.
Well, I never thought it would be possible to make parasites amusing. Good job, Roget.
After careful consideration, I have to agree with Rhett. Sorry, man. While it was amusing, it wasn't really anomalous.
Good lord, I don't even know what to think of this other than that it deserves an upvote.
if your reading this your gay
Original, awesome concept. Good fun to read and overall well written.
+1
"What the f-NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO" - Site Director Rogers, upon discovery of SCP-1624
Anywho, this was awesome to read. Short, sweet and fun. +1
It's an original concept, but it's way too short for me, and overall, it comes across as trying too hard to be clever. Also, not too big a fan of parasite articles. Put some more meat on the bones and I might change my mind, but for now, -1.
Way too lulzy for me, I'm sorry. It's funny but I can't in good conscience upvote this.
*edit* actually, no. Hold the hell up. How is this even provably ANOMALOUS? Why would the Foundation even care about it? Someone could easily set up a website like this as a JOKE. How would anybody be able to tell the difference between it being a joke and being legitimate? Because you can go to such and such location and ingest a parasite? Come on.
This is less of an SCP than even a -J article, and I am disappointed in you for posting this. You're better than this. It'll get upvoted I've no doubt, for reasons similar to why ___-J does, but that doesn't make it good.
Seconding. Nothing in this indicates that it's anomalous unless we can prove it's not just an internet prank.
I could literally make this website right now, even with my very limited website creation abilities, and even make it so that you would probably find each parasite mentioned on the webpage at the locations you are directed to. There's just no way.
Thirding. Because I read this three times over trying to find the anomaly.
Fithin'
Seriously, with all the bizarre dating sites out there, you would have to wonder why the foundation would take this one in particular seriously.
I'm not really seeing it here. Not really enough details to show why this thing is anomalous enough to warrant the Foundation's attention.
There's nothing about this that needs to be contained. It's like taking The Onion seriously.
Also, what's with the redaction for the IP address and the URL? You aren't redacting enough of it to be worthwhile, and a value above 255 is invalid, in any case. Looks rather like a Comcast home networking address, aside from that. (I used to work for Comcast in their repair department) Looking at your hostmask in the chat, I'd say it was derived from your own.
Also, if you wanted to shut down an IP within the US, just toss a DMCA request at their IP address, and use ICANN to block off the name server.
/forum/t-620719/scp-1624#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
