SCP-2254 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-2254.

page 1 of 212next »

100% definitely not at all in any way could ever be conceived of as a rewrite which it is not.

djkaktus 06 Jun 2018 19:04

#1 of 4.

This is not a rewrite. Thanks to WJS, ARD, and a few other acronym'd individuals who looked at this in drafting. Also thanks to djoric for continuing to inspire me, even to this day. Love you bro.

Any part of this that might resemble something in another SCP series is 100% coincidental. Nothing within this article is intended to evoke any themes or suggest any connection with any other article, except for #2, #3, and #4 of 4, whenever they're posted. The story, all names, characters, and incidents portrayed in this production are fictitious. No identification with actual persons (living or deceased or fictional), places, buildings, and products is intended or should be inferred.

Image sources before anyone shows up asking for provenance

Fetus.jpg comes from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fetus_in_fetu_radiograph.jpg#/media/File:Fetus_in_fetu_after_operation.jpg.
littleriver.jpg comes from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Little_River_Canyon_National_Park,Gaylesville,AL.jpg.
jack.jpg comes from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vrubel_Demon_Ceramics.JPG with a few minor edits by me.

The first two are CC, the third is public domain.

Last edited on 06 Jun 2018 19:07 by djkaktus Show more

IAmTheOoga 06 Jun 2018 22:35

Can't wait to see the rest, my dude! Only thing better than one good article is a good series!

Re: 100% definitely not at all in any way could ever be conceived of as a rewrite which it is not.

Agent Kal 06 Mar 2021 02:36

I live in fort payne alabama which is right beside little river canyon and even though this scp is fake it is actually real. their have been many sightings.

Moderator Staff Post - Closed

Naepic 06 Mar 2021 03:47

Per the site rules, SCP isn't real, and roleplay isn't allowed on the forums. Don't post stuff like this again.

stormfallen 06 Jun 2018 19:20

Any part of this that might resemble something in another SCP series is 100% coincidental.

X. Doubt

Fucking great work though, might compete with 2610 as your most disturbing SCP.

TL333s 06 Jun 2018 22:56

This is the perfect combination of spiders, sexual predation, and the utter horribleness that is the Black Tuesday Protocol. Like, that should be up there with 110-Montauk, you've created that much of a monster.

even as it devours her from the inside out.

This is maybe a little off tone? But otherwise, I loved this. And if there's more coming, I am excited to see what it is!

Accelerando 08 Jun 2018 18:53

Was also going to post about that part, since it sort of jumps from passively describing to "dangerous animal documentary" narration.

And unrelated, but I'm a fan of that second image. You turned an already creepy sculpture into something that fits right in to the document.

Last edited on 09 Jun 2018 04:15 by Accelerando Show more

Shaggydredlocks 07 Jun 2018 07:28

First 049 and now this?

You're too good to us.

MaliceAforethought 07 Jun 2018 11:30

Didn't you hear? This is not a rewrite.

djkaktus 07 Jun 2018 12:51

Definitely not a rewrite. The two have nothing in common. No similarities whatsoever. 100%.

Prof_JL 07 Jun 2018 21:47

And definitely not a metaphor for american rural depression _(right?)

djkaktus 08 Jun 2018 12:33

Definitely not a metaphor for towns where nobody leaves and everybody just sits around and fucks and gets pregnant and does smack and then just keeps doing that.

multizig 08 Jun 2018 14:28

Nothing to see here folks, nothing at all.
(in all seriousness rural depression is a big issue here in america)

sirpudding 07 Jun 2018 13:19

I feel like I should get the "not a rewrite" thing, but I don't. If this isn't a reimagined SCP-952, then what is the subtext that I am missing?

djkaktus 07 Jun 2018 14:11

Here are four absolutely factual statements:

1. This was drafted as a rewrite of SCP-952.
2. That draft was green-lit by members of the Rewrite Team.
3. I was later informed that this article and SCP-952 have absolutely nothing in common, and therefore,
4. This cannot be considered a rewrite.

Statements made by Mr. djkaktus about any relation between SCP-2254 and other, unrelated articles that some could consider being similar in theme though dramatically more offensive and outright racially charged (though Mr. djkaktus makes no comment on whether or not those views are substantiated) should be considered purely coincidental and simply a result of the lack of appropriate linguistic diversity available by which a person might compare two alike but wholly unrelated and definitely not rewritten things that, again, have nothing in common with each other.

Last edited on 07 Jun 2018 14:35 by djkaktus Show more

sirpudding 07 Jun 2018 14:28

Ah, context not subtext, understood.

WrongJohnSilver 07 Jun 2018 14:13

Aha, so you posted it directly!

Noted. Excellent.

TKSeoul 07 Jun 2018 14:21

Wow, absolutely horrifying. Great images and great containment procedures. +1

Tat0b910 09 Jun 2018 13:25

Disturbing (the good day)

+1

thefirecrest 10 Jun 2018 02:04

Not even joking, I was half way through reading this when my roommate turns on a YouTube history video on our TV that started off with creepy musicbox music and the words “look at this baby. Innocent isn’t it?” I was on the edge about +1 earlier (nothing wrong with it, I’m just not too fond of creepy baby monster) but this made me go through. I’m scared haha.

+1

DeltaMagnatude 21 Jun 2018 09:32

Wasn't this SCiP meant for the 954 rewrite?

yes ive been stalking your kaktus kontainer

Jesus Christ that birth cycle of the alien fetal.

I love the 2nd Addendum. Really shows how the Foundation will take the extra miles just to contain certain types of anomalies, such as that "Normality Will Be Protected" Apotheosis SCiP.
+1

Last edited on 21 Jun 2018 09:33 by DeltaMagnatude Show more

page 1 of 212next »