SCP-1996 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-1996.

page 1 of 3123next »

Rejekyll 29 Nov 2012 03:30

He's not the SCP, is he…

Upvoted.

MayD 29 Nov 2012 03:33

SCP-199 6will

Typo. Otherwise, it's really good

RJB_R 29 Nov 2012 03:34

I feex

---

Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!

MayD 29 Nov 2012 03:37

Thanks. I feel like the guy is a scout for an inter-dimensional tourist company. Amirite?

Sensei Le Roof 29 Nov 2012 18:36

I feexed other oopsie

Eskobar 29 Nov 2012 03:35

Definitely not bad, but too much seems to me like something of a clone of all the "let's say creepy shit" SCPs we've had in the last couple of months. No vote for now.

FullHazard 29 Nov 2012 03:37

Why do you post all the good ideas, Roget. Leave some ideas for the other kids.

For serious though, I thought at the beginning it was going to be 'Future Tourists with a Time Machine" and was gonna downvote. Then I got to the addendum, and I was 'dafuq' enough to upvote.

Edrobot 29 Nov 2012 03:39

I challenge someone to come up with a good SCP for "Reilly the Shadow Imp" and/or "The Dance Machine".

Last edited on 29 Nov 2012 03:40 by Edrobot Show more

Technician Downs 29 Nov 2012 07:00

I was going to draft ghost-monkey the poop machine, but chat, thou art glorious in thy wisdom.

ksaid 29 Nov 2012 07:06

Boom.

Reilly the Shadow Imp and The Dance Machine.

Dexanote 29 Nov 2012 03:52

I don't like saying this, but i dont get it. It feels like a weaker take on that one oceanic museum with anomalous people in it. And fish stuff. I'm sorry.

Communism will win 29 Nov 2012 06:48

Dude's a tourist. If that helps at all.

---

if your reading this your gay

Last edited on 29 Nov 2012 06:48 by Communism will win Show more

Jaquerel 29 Nov 2012 06:30

Now, it's a good read, but I just have to say.

What? It feels like the containment procedures could be summed up with "Well, contain it."
This threatens and confuses me.
No vote from me.
_{I don't like being confused >:U}

RJB_R 29 Nov 2012 16:40

… I think pretty much every set of containment procedures on the wiki could be summarized like that.

---

Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!

Jaquerel 29 Nov 2012 20:13

That is certainly a point.
That… That is what that is.

It's just that they like to say "Well, contain it this way…"

Forlorn Willow 29 Nov 2012 11:25

"It(s) all beautiful, isn't it?"

… Is that an its/it's mistake? I'm not sure …

wishun 29 Nov 2012 15:39

"…Dance Machine forces you to all to boogie all night!"
Too many to's there. Didn't fix because I thought that slightly screwball grammer might be on purpose, what with being a tourist tout from outside reality and all.

Not bad, but I feel like I'm missing something. And not in the good "there's something else going on here" way. So, no vote.

tombones 29 Nov 2012 16:31

Yeah, the found documents are the most important part of something like this, and the few provided aren't strong enough to carry the article, IMO. The descriptions don't really read like most brochure copy, either (subject matter aside), they're more like a lazy parody of B-movie trailer narration you might expect to hear in a local TV spot. Promising premise, weak execution. Downvoting for now, but I'd be pleased to see an improved draft.

Last edited on 29 Nov 2012 16:34 by tombones Show more

page 1 of 3123next »