SCP-1763 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-1763.

page 1 of 3123next »

Salman Corbette 25 Nov 2012 06:10

Dear sober Sal:

I hope i haven't posted this against your better judgement. I think this SCP was ripe for posting, and after some revision in the chat I have determined it is ready.

- Drunk Sal

PS I have already broken your trust by posting this as the SCP title as opposed to "SCP-1763". I have since rectified this, but do not let me do this again.

PPS I have also forgotten to give image credit to Wilt, who inspired this thing by giving me said image. Once again, I urge you to prevent me from doing this again.

Last edited on 25 Nov 2012 06:13 by Salman Corbette Show more

(account deleted) 25 Nov 2012 06:17

And might I say, you really surprised me with what you turned this into. I would have done something obvious, but you really took it to a higher level. Good work on the good concept.

Rejekyll 25 Nov 2012 06:15

Sal, you have a problem.

Communism will win 25 Nov 2012 06:19

Eh, I changed my mind. I like it.

---

if your reading this your gay

FullHazard 25 Nov 2012 06:24

What is SCP-1763-A-37, and why does it cover things in pink slime?

Voct 04 Aug 2013 16:52

-37 is just another member of the theater troupe. As for why it covers things in pink slime: look, have you seen -37 ? If you had, you'd know why.

Hats are the system.

xxHBxx 25 Nov 2012 06:29

I'm not a fan of the prose part, but the Addendums saved it.

negativeashi 25 Nov 2012 06:45

"While mentions of Godot remained unchanged, "God" was replaced with "Dog" throughout the production."
Heh. That's my favorite line.

ShockwaveLover 25 Nov 2012 09:10

Much like Performance Incident #31, this is 'oddly compelling'.

catboy637 25 Nov 2012 15:43

This is weird, but it really doesn't do anything for me. It doesn't really join together into a cohesive piece. No vote.

Last edited on 25 Nov 2012 15:44 by catboy637 Show more

Anaxagoras 25 Nov 2012 16:01

I'm actually not a fan of this. The classification is a bit confusing, and the article goes on too long before getting into the performance log, which is the real meat of the article anyhow. Once you get to those, it seems like a knock-off of SCP-1986, but with plays instead of books. Just doesn't do it for me, Sal.

Rioghail 25 Nov 2012 16:55

Thank you, Anaxagoras, for putting into words exactly what was bugging me about this article.

That said, the idea of a theatre director made out of a pair of giant mechanical arms is an image I really, really like. It's a shame I can't find the rest of the article compelling enough to upvote for that.

Sensei Le Roof 25 Nov 2012 16:19

Is the dangling modifier an intended part of #31's description?

page 1 of 3123next »