No, because it doesn't give you the lady's personality. It just gives you the body image of that woman.
Ah, so, technically, it's a reverse of 963. Hmmm.
Admin, SCP Wiki
13 gets ARC'd and a new 13 is up in about 30 seconds. Oh wow.
But yeah, I'm not quite feeling this. No vote.
Writing needs work, but I like the general concept. Cigarettes seems a little random, but whatevs. No vote.
This is pretty solid. The note's enough to give a little backstory but leave us wondering.
if your reading this your gay
I like this, I like this a lot. One thing I would like to see is the psychological effects of a male using it. I know many transgendered people and let me tell you, being forced to live as the opposite sex (even if only in perception) is torture.
(account deleted)I like it. Subtle but very mysterious and potentially dangerous. Ah, also:
subjects will gradually begin to perceive themselves as having the features of the woman, and will gradually perceive their bodies changing to reflect her appearance (…)
Sounds a little redundant to me. Wouldn't "Subjects will gradually begin to perceive themselves as having the appearance of the unidentified woman" work better?
Despite that, a fine SCP to me.
Don't really like the effect.
Immediately after consuming an instance of SCP-013, subjects will immediately perceive
Repetitive.
under 013's effect.
I think that 013 instead of SCP-013 is too informal for an article and should only be used OOC and in tales, but that might be just me.
transcribed below.
During the investigation of Miles' apartment,
The new line is botched.
I think that 013 instead of SCP-013 is too informal for an article and should only be used OOC and in tales, but that might be just me.
I disagree with this. Redundantly using SCP-XXX becomes tiresome and clumsy in my opinion.
For what it's worth; tedundant, repetitious, tiresome, and clumsy terminology is very much in keeping with the style of the formal scientific/bureacratic documentation that SCPs are supposed to emulate.
Science journals are full of sentences like "Fully-detailed-drawn-out-designation shows the behavior characteristic of Fully-detailed-drawn-out-designation when subjected to the conditions that Fully-detailed-drawn-out-designation reacts to."
But it ultimately comes down to a matter of personal taste.
…crap, Dex, I didn't see your comment till after I replaced the 013s with SCP-013s. N.b. that I routinely change ###s to SCP-###s wherever I see them (and bother editing), but… if it's a conscious stylistic choice on your part, I better revert my changes.
