SCP-1615 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-1615.

page 1 of 3123next »

Eskobar 30 Aug 2012 23:40

I like SCPs that show the Foundation to be…not evil, in a grimdark sense, but just reactionary. As they would be. +1

Rioghail 30 Aug 2012 23:43

A rewrite of the now-deleted SCP-1139 candidate, 'Weight Gain Manna' by Abodos, which got purged for creepy stuff related to fat fetishism. Abodos then gave me permission to re-write it, and this is what me and VAElynx came up with. Also credit to Smapti for SCP-1176, which inspired some parts of this article.

Last edited on 30 Aug 2012 23:51 by Rioghail Show more

(account deleted) 01 Sep 2012 05:34

Much, much better than what I came up with. Good job.

VAElynx 03 Sep 2012 13:01

Very good.
One thing I'd perhaps emphasize more - photosynthesis implies increased water requirements. Might not be that good for those in water-poor countries.

InfinityWhale 30 Aug 2012 23:55

I feel like the "exposure to light in excess of 10,000 lux" was unnecessary, but other than that it was quite compelling. +1.

SpoonOfEvil 30 Aug 2012 23:57

I kinda like the idea of a GOI that actually wants to try and find humanitarian applications for SCPs.

Wally Caine 31 Aug 2012 01:15

I think my favorite part is the third addendum. It sorta makes it hit home that these people, though well intentioned, are messing with stuff, and perhaps even more importantly, groups that they don't really understand, but they are learning. And they're realizing the lengths the Foundation will go to keep everything normal.

pdirichlet8 31 Aug 2012 01:22

Nice concept, good execution, and a well-done link to a GoI. +1

Smapti 31 Aug 2012 01:43

I'm pretty sure I read this exact thing in an old sci-fi magazine when I was a teenager.

This is well-written, though, and i'm happy to see another MCF article, so +1.

Communism will win 31 Aug 2012 01:59

I'm iffy on a fungus causing the generation of chloroplasts and on the use of the Ethics Committee, but it was a good read nonetheless, so +1.

---

if your reading this your gay

Doktori 31 Aug 2012 02:34

Nicely done.

Goodwill 31 Aug 2012 03:32

Not bad. I'm just a bit iffy on the use of the Ethics Committee as well, but it's good to see another MCF article.

page 1 of 3123next »