Can't rate it.
SCP-1802 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-1802
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-1802.
Fixed. Then downvoted for the reasons I told you earlier. Sorry, it just doesn't click with me. Actually, it seems better than when I read it before. Undownvoted, but it's still not enough for an upvote.
I like the concept, a bits'n'pieces robot with a hoarding issue, but the execution feels lacking. I've downvoted for now but if this gets polished up I'll definitely be changing my vote.
*Quibble, but:
Armed Containment Area 24
Areas are for Keter class objects, and Armed facilities are unusually well-armed (to fight off armies and stuff), and lastly Containment facilities are to house dangerous/potentially dangerous objects that aren't being researched. None of those seem like the kind of place to hold this guy.
As per the guide.
(account deleted)There may not be a canon, but there is a SOP. And it tends to be followed.
Alright, I changed the procedures and polished the article a bit.
Researchers assigned to SCP-1802 are permitted to provide the object with pieces of trash so that it remains cooperative during interviews and experiments. This request has been approved.
I thought you removed this.
I also still don't approve of it being found trying to remove Foundation cameras. You'd think there'd be reports or something from civilians before this. Guess that's just me.
No vote.
Living the dream, or dreaming the life?
This request has been approved.
That sentence isn't needed.
By this task I become cool.
Made me think this was going to be an "Are We Cool Yet" SCP.
i fully agree with the second sentiment, in fact, if it's not, then it just makes no sense
One of the most unbearable things about this unbearable little sub-group is the compulsion people have to slather it on articles. I get that it sort of works on, like, a meta level, but the shit gets real old fast. This is more than clear enough as it is and one of maaaybe two AWCY entries that doesn't make me try to roll my eyes from my skull. There's more than enough tells here to work it out.
I reallyreallyreally want to like this, but it's just not quite there. Pay close attention to any feedback you get, this has so much potential.
This is come a long way. I'd like to say that it started out in this condition, but I posted the sandbox version probably dozens of times on IRC.
The second "note" was what really got me. So, upvote.
I like this quite a lot, and think that it's a good example of what a certain unnamed collective would certainly do. It's actually a kind of statement about something instead of just "lol we're gonna fuck you up and call it art."
That being said, the execution just felt very eh. Still, you get my +1.
/forum/t-470230/scp-1802#post-
page revision: 1, last edited: 02 Apr 2021 15:16
