So, what do you think of these little guys?
Attribution here.- Scantron
SCP-111 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-111
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-111.
Picture credit goes to Erin Metcalf. Website: http://www.EirewolfCreations.com. Image location: http://www.eirewolfcreations.com/?page=gallery&gallery_id=1&piece_id=110&picture_id=8
if your reading this your gay
The link to the image location is dead. The image seems to be only available on DeviantArt: http://eirewolfcreations.deviantart.com/art/DragonSnails-1st-Sight-Kinoko-132389179
Noting here that the owner of the Dragonsnails image, Erin Metcalf, has stated that she does not want the picture to be licensed under creative commons.
As such, anyone intending to use the image must contact her and obtain her permission prior to using the image for anything.
Posting here for clarity.
The image has been removed due to the author not releasing their sculptures under creative commons. To avoid any futures issues arising from SCP related content, the Licensing team has decided to remove this image to respect the original creator's wishes.
Anyone who wishes to continue viewing the Dragon Snails are free to go onto Erin Metcalf's website to do so.
I want one
đ đđđđ đĽ đ đ đ đŚ đ đ
Containment procedures could be toned down a little in terms of size, but I like this otherwise.
(account deleted)Fixed enclosure size, glad to hear people like these little guys. Kind of confused on where the grammar and capitalization problems are, but if I find out I'll fix them. As for Dragon-Snails being "too awesome for Wondertainment" I'm really not sure how to fix that….
Any ideas?
EDIT: Ten upvotes, no downvotes? This is somewhat surprising.
You didn't fix it.
If there's a lot of them, 50x50 wouldn't be all that unreasonable.
The problem is, let me rephrase.. ehm
WTF DOES IT HAVE TO BE A FRIGGIN' CUBE.
Seriously ,ever seen a cubic glasshouse? No? Me neither.
Could always run a side-effect of feeding them the wrong food.. But I personally find the article to be fine by itself as something Wondertainment made later when they figured out what people wanted.
At first I thought was going to be a "SNAILS! EWWWWWWWW!" type article.
Then I read it and now I want one.
Upvoting, though i'll agree it seems too bright and shiny for Wondertainment. These things need some sort of downside - maybe they breed exponentially if they're kept in pairs?
Actually, on this line of reasoning, I say to make them prolific grazers, capable on annihilating crops and destroying ecosystems if they get into the wild.
O.K. here's what I've got:
1. VAElynx, have you tried refreshing the page? As for cubical nature, remember the foundation just builds cells to keep stuff in before they find the stuff, so they generally make it the same size. Also, I assume the foundation annoys enough building connecters "You want a pool of acid? With insurance against reptile attacks? And a few hundred locks? WTF?" that they probably need to standardize cells at least somewhat.
2. Feeding them the wrong food just turns them into a gremlins rip-off. Sorry but no. In an original, per-sandbox form I considered having them breath fire as a way of making them more unsafe. But I thought that made them too dragonlike.
3. Smapti, I like your idea that they breed exponentially best. Too much of a good thing after all….
1. I immensely dislike this reasoning. This sort of thing would be kept on a low-hazard bio-containment site, most likely in several large terraria. For one , a 5m tall enclosure is friggin' impractical when you need to manipulate with them… for two ,I can't imagine any reason the Foundation would have pre-built 125m^3 cubes lying around…
And yes, there are standard types of enclosure such as the beloved Standard Humanoid Containment cell, however they are more sensibly dimensioned.
2. Good addition. I'm liking them more and more. And tacking on cheap danger wouldn't work well for this either.
/forum/t-469985/scp-111#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
