Frankly, there's a lot of otherwise good articles that are marred by threats of "Keter Duty", "SCP-682 duty", or other such punishments for misusing an SCP in one way or another, because apparently Foundation researchers have all the professionalism of a pack of rabid monkeys (Bright gets a pass in cases where he is, in fact, one or more rabid monkeys).
So this thread is dedicated to two things:
1) Compiling a list of articles with this problem.
2) Fixing the problem.
I've started a list, but I need to let my chinchilla out to play before she starts taking a leaf out of the rabid monkeys' book. Here's what I've got so far:
~EDIT~ Removing these fromthe list as they're fixed
SCP-827
1. "Trust me, whoever let THAT particular SCP know about SCP-827 is going on immediate Keter duty. -O5-██"
2. "That's the final straw. Hence forth any submitted research proposal must have as a goal the investigation of the safety and immediate commercialization of this technology. Any proposal not of major strategic importance (i.e. neutralization of Keter-class objects) for use of SCP-class resources will be denied, and the submitter will be assigned to Keter duty. -O5-██"
~EDIT2~
Leaving 827 alone until we get word from Snorl on it.
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.