SCP-O5-J / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-O5-J.

page 1 of 3123next »

Quaristice 11 Nov 2017 02:37

Noticed how a lot of new SCP articles have (sometimes unnecessarily long…okay, mostly unnecessarily long) security and verification portions, so thought I'd poke a bit of fun at it. Sorry.

Thanks to whoever authored this post for the redacted navy seal copypasta.

Communism will win 11 Nov 2017 02:46

Sorry, but my gold standard for "I fucked your mom" jokes is this comic. Since this is not as funny as that, I'm downvoting.

---

if your reading this your gay

mlister 11 Nov 2017 03:10

You know what? I laughed. Take the upvote.

---

No signature defined.

Vanson 11 Nov 2017 03:13

It's so simple and classic that it should be boring, but I actually laughed. +1

(account deleted) 11 Nov 2017 03:40

this -j somehow wound up in my head canon. +1

---

~Baubi

Eol Kredik 11 Nov 2017 03:45

Even though I kind of felt sullied for laughing, I did.

+1 in spite of my taste

Genshed 11 Nov 2017 04:03

I got to the end, thought "wow, format screw."

You laid the egg in my brain, and that's what hatched.

+1

Modern_Erasmus 11 Nov 2017 04:46

Eh, 028-J did a better job at mocking the security theater.

Shaggydredlocks 11 Nov 2017 06:20

Yea, this is a pretty lame setup for paying off a tired, basic joke. That redacted section reads like bad copypasta.

Communism will win 11 Nov 2017 06:46

It literally is copypasta. It's the Navy Seal Copypasta with a bunch of [REDACTED] in the mix. (And as a Navy Seal Copypasta aficionado, I'd really require a more creative take on it to be entertained)

---

if your reading this your gay

Zyn 11 Nov 2017 04:48

Any chance that long string of numbers can be shortened? It's messing with my screen display and is kind of an annoyance while reading this.

Wild Angle 11 Nov 2017 19:18

I think this is good, but it adds many big fragments of text that spoil the humor of the article. Yes, I'm talking about the long-name-fifty-five-numbers-terminal and the Navy Seal Copypasta. It's similar to what SCP-1234-J did when it was posted.

I advise you to edit those two things. The rating of the article is currently -9; I think they're the reason.

page 1 of 3123next »