The Consequences of a Deep, Dark Disassociation / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page The Consequences of a Deep, Dark Disassociation.

Wowie

DarkStuff 01 Nov 2017 13:57

If this succeeds, this will be my quickest post ever. One day from concept to a page. That would be a good feeling and greatly boost my confidence as an author. Let's hope it works out that way. Anyways, this is going to be the successor to URA-1902, my most controversial piece (it sits at +32 right now but it also has 8 downvotes). Hopefully it sheds some light in places, but also deepens the mystery in others. It also serves as a means for me to plug everything I've written, so yay~!

Spoilers?

Rachael Davidson appeared in this only to say that she is going to be a recurring character. She isn't playing a huge part right now, but URA-1902 is not the only mystery that will be solved. Her childhood will be too.

Also, I only chose Site-31 because I made it up for SCP-3018, so check that out as well. I literally made this connect to all of my other works. Yay for that! Yay for the shameless plugs!

And you opened this collapsible expecting explanation. Pfft I say. Pfft.

Last edited on 01 Nov 2017 13:58 by DarkStuff Show more

MaliceAforethought 01 Nov 2017 15:52

Wowie indeed. This was a really, really good read, and held my interest just like your other work — with surreal experiences that leave you more confused than when you started. Needless to say, I can't wait to see where you take the story.

Abettik 01 Nov 2017 20:04

+1

Good read, but it definitely opens more questions than it answers. Kinda like an episode of LOST! :)

DarkStuff 02 Nov 2017 01:53

Don't worry, all will be answered in time…

…Maybe.

hello cakeguy 10 Nov 2017 16:37

Daddy always answers the questions? right? ☻

DarkStuff 11 Nov 2017 06:56

Ewwwwww

EDIT: Unless you're just trying to be creepy in a way that connects with the tale (I did use "daddy" in there but it's hidden).

EDIT 2: Wait shit "daddy" was hidden in URA-1902 not this one whoops.

Last edited on 11 Nov 2017 06:58 by DarkStuff Show more

hello cakeguy 13 Nov 2017 13:51

Trying to connect it with URA-1902, i.e. the smile-face. It didn't go though my mind that that could be considered creepy, whoops. Don't know how to rephrase it to make it less so though. Rip. I guess i'm creepy now. :P

Blackfluidexv 13 Nov 2017 19:06

What the hell?

DarkStuff 13 Nov 2017 23:02

;3

TL333s 06 Jul 2018 23:26

Wow. The interview was intensely unsettling, and the ending is a perfect twist. It doesn't even matter that this sheds light on the otherwise opaque URA event, it opens so many new doors. :D

Ellie3 28 Jan 2020 16:40

God, can I just say I absolutely love the concept of LaFerrier? A compliant Foundation agent with multiple of themselves. Honestly, it's the perfect excuse to have an agent to stick into all of your articles— which at some points with certain agent characters, doesn't make sense— and it's just… intriguing. +1.

catalinacobalt 14 Mar 2020 00:43

Wow, that interview was wicked intense. I would dearly love to see this as a short film, the juxtaposition between the interview and the phone call would be downright chilling. Excellent work!