The only parts in the article that really could be blocked out are the Doctor's name. I don't see why the length of the surrounding, the year discovered, casualties, or the language spoken need to be blocked out. In fact, the length of the enclosure SHOULD be known so that proper containment protocols are followed. Additionally, why block out the language? If it's a named language, then how much weirder could it be next to the fact that this is a giant, robotic, baby? It could be speaking Sumerian Pig-Latin and I still wouldn't find it as weird as the rest of the article. Additionally, the dual reference to language reinforces the distraction of that entire notion.
I don't particularly like the reference to the CotBG. Although there is no canon, as it stands the reference to CotBG is doesn't really seem to fit, and it might have to do with the quality of the article in general.
Take out the superfluous references to languages, clean up (or even completely remove) the interview, and then MAYBE the reference to CotBG is merited. I think the idea of a giant, mechanical infant who can't speak and is horrified at the picture of SCP-882 is both simpler and more terrifying.
