There was an announcement made by Waxx tonight regarding the changes to the #site19 chat policy. Its contents have been logged here for others to be able to read (for those who missed it).
Timestamps are in Pacific Time, and the whole log is cut into parts in collapsible blocks for convenience. For those with computers who cannot handle the collapsible blocks, there's a raw pastebin available here: http://pastebin.com/Ftib8Q6A
[16:55:02] *** mode/#nuremburg [+m] by Waxx
[16:58:22] *** Waxx changed the topic of #nuremburg to: The room is moderated for now. People with something to say will be voiced in turn so as not to cause a clusterfuck
[17:01:03] <@Waxx> Gonna give it a few more minutes to try and get more people in here
[17:03:35] <@Waxx> Hello everyone
[17:03:50] <@Waxx> Thank you for either giving enough of a shit to come, or anticipating hilarity
[17:04:32] <@Waxx> I am just going to run through a few changes that we made and explain why we did that
[17:04:38] <@Waxx> Later on you'll be allowed to ask questions
[17:04:49] <@Waxx> The way you can do that will be explained at that time, so just sit tight for the time being
[17:04:56] *** mode/#nuremburg [+N] by Waxx
[17:05:37] <@Waxx> One of the biggest changes is that ops and mods are no longer omnipotent beings of authority
[17:06:05] <@Waxx> It was one of my biggest issues with how things were done prior
[17:06:27] <@Waxx> I am holding them to the same rules that I am holding regular users to
[17:06:41] <@Waxx> And I won't tolerate personal feelings or grievances affecting policy towards users
[17:07:03] <@Waxx> A mod cannot ban you simply because he doesn't like you
[17:07:05] <@Waxx> At least, not anymore
[17:07:25] <@Waxx> Also gone are the days when questioning the actions of moderators was grounds for a ban
[17:07:58] <@Waxx> I am expecting each of them to be able to explain their actions and decisions to you, if you feel it's necessary to ask
[17:08:04] <@Waxx> If they can't do that, then there is a problem that I have to deal with
[17:08:55] <@Waxx> At the same time though, I am also trusting each of them to act autonomously, which is why I hand picked a bunch of new faces
[17:09:20] <@Waxx> I trust each and every one of them to do their job effectively and fairly
[17:09:48] <@Waxx> I think I'm finally to a point where I don't need to add any more
[17:09:51] <@Waxx> So that is good
[17:10:03] <@Waxx> There should never be a time when there isn't someone capable of making a decision and acting upon it
[17:10:26] <@Waxx> Without requiring authority from someone above them (namely me)
[17:10:49] <@Waxx> I've explained everything I said above to each of them and they're all in agreement with my ideas
[17:11:07] <@Waxx> That about covers what I expect from the mods
[17:11:22] <@Waxx> As far as the users go, there are some things I need to go ove
[17:11:24] <@Waxx> *over
[17:12:07] <@Waxx> We will tolerate any civil and respectful discussion of any topic, so long as it's not disrupting others
[17:12:21] <@Waxx> The only two topics that we are strictly not allowing are politics and religion
[17:12:31] <@Waxx> Mostly this is a restricton on me, rather than you, but I digress
[17:12:51] <@Waxx> Simply linking a news article and commenting on it is fine
[17:13:01] <@Waxx> But as soon as it gets into "lolamericans" or "lollibtards", it has to stop
[17:13:56] <@Waxx> Sort of along those lines, we are not going to allow Site19 to become your own private porn sharing site anymore
[17:14:19] <@Waxx> I could have dealt with it once or twice a week, but almost every night I am seeing endless columns of NSFW links
[17:14:25] <@Waxx> Often times it's the same repeat offenders
[17:14:38] <@Waxx> I'm not going to name any names here but consider yourselves on notice that it won't be tolerated any more
[17:14:44] <@Waxx> If you want to do that, go make your own room
[17:14:57] <@Waxx> The minimum age limit is 15
[17:15:06] <@Waxx> That means not everyone in the room will be of legal age to view this kind of shit
[17:15:13] <@Waxx> A few links here and there is okay, but you get the idea
[17:15:49] <@Waxx> The reason we tolerate Ecks doing it is because Ecks makes maybe one post every 15 minutes, if that
[17:15:51] <@Waxx> And that's it
[17:15:59] <@Waxx> I'm talking about a literal hour and a half's worth of nothing but porn
[17:16:11] <@Waxx> And if you think I am joking, just watch later tonight when it starts
[17:16:32] <@Waxx> Next topic, is roleplaying in the chat
[17:16:34] <@Waxx> This also has to end
[17:16:50] <@Waxx> I feel like I am cracking down on a few people who just want to have fun, but it is also getting out of hand
[17:17:20] <@Waxx> Again, the occasional incident is fine, but when we start getting into fully fledged scenarios, I have to do something
[17:17:33] <@Waxx> This too is mostly the same repeat offenders
[17:17:38] <@Waxx> Get your own room
[17:17:43] <@Waxx> Or go to #activeduty
[17:18:16] <@Waxx> #scpactiveduty, thanks brad
[17:18:19] <@Waxx> herp derp
[17:18:51] <@Waxx> I'm not going to start banning for any of this
[17:18:57] <@Waxx> But after giving repeated warnings, it's coming to a point
[17:19:05] <@Waxx> So pretty soon, it will be bannable
[17:19:40] <@Waxx> I think those are the major points I wanted to cover
[17:19:50] <@Waxx> A lot of people are saying that site19 needs to be fixed
[17:20:20] <@Waxx> Most of them are people who were around for a long time and remember how it used to be when we had a max of 30 users at any given time, and that was considered a high number
[17:20:27] <@Waxx> Site19 is what it is
[17:20:42] <@Waxx> The best we can hope for is to try and reduce some of the random and silly behavior to more manageable levels
[17:20:56] <@Waxx> Anything beyond that and I begin becoming literally Hitler
[17:21:28] <@Waxx> I probably forgot something
[17:21:29] <@Waxx> But oh well
[17:21:38] <@Waxx> If you have something to say or a question to ask, here is how this will work
[17:21:52] <@Waxx> I'm going to try and limit it to one person at a time so as not to let anyone's comments get buried in discussion
[17:22:09] <@Waxx> Echo, Sophos and myself will handle this
[17:22:17] <@Waxx> So if you'd like to speak, just PM one of us and we'll get you in
[17:22:21] <@Waxx> One last thing before we go
[17:22:32] <@Waxx> A while back I said "The Game" was bannable
[17:22:34] <@Waxx> I was being serious
[17:22:38] <@Waxx> I will ban anyone who makes a "the game" joke
[17:22:49] <@Waxx> 4chan shit should remain at 4chan
[17:23:08] <@Waxx> And regarding something I forgot about the age limit
[17:23:26] <@Waxx> Clone is the only, repeat only person I am allowing to stay despite the age limit, for the sole purpose that she was here before it began being seriously enforced
[17:23:35] <@Waxx> And because she isn't terribly stupid, yet
[17:23:49] <@Waxx> As soon as she or anyone else tries something illegal, she is getting banned
[17:23:50] <@Waxx> So there
[17:23:54] <@Waxx> Don't feed Clone
[17:23:57] <@Waxx> I will ban you
[17:24:09] <@Waxx> Okay
[17:24:16] <@Waxx> If you have a comment or question, go ahead and PM one of the three of us
[17:25:01] *** mode/#nuremburg [+v oops_ur_dead] by Waxx
[17:25:01] <@Waxx> First contestant
[17:25:12] <+oops_ur_dead> I've actually got two questions
[17:25:19] <@Waxx> I should mention that asking stupid questions will get you banned in here and in site19
[17:25:22] <@Waxx> So please don't abuse this
[17:25:24] <+oops_ur_dead> The first is regarding what you said about politics and religion discussion
[17:25:26] <@Waxx> Proceed
[17:25:31] <+oops_ur_dead> Okay
[17:25:32] <+oops_ur_dead> So
[17:25:44] <+oops_ur_dead> Does that include light debate and discussion?
[17:25:58] <+oops_ur_dead> For instance, if I talk about my political views without insulting anyone else's, is that disallowed?
[17:26:03] <@Waxx> This is a gray area
[17:26:13] <@Waxx> The big problem with politics is that some people are very passionate
[17:26:30] <@Waxx> I myself will generally allow it so long as it's remaining civil; the problem is that it never stays that way for long
[17:26:35] <@Waxx> Other ops may have a different idea on that
[17:26:52] <@Waxx> There's always a bit of leeway with these things, and I know most of you aren't stupid
[17:27:05] <@Waxx> That's not a very specific answer, I know
[17:27:09] <@Waxx> But there really is no specific answer to it
[17:27:12] <+oops_ur_dead> I understand
[17:27:14] <@Waxx> Use your head and your best judgement
[17:27:17] <@Waxx> And things will be okay :)
[17:27:18] <+oops_ur_dead> My second question
[17:27:25] <+oops_ur_dead> You mentioned roleplaying being disallowed
[17:27:46] <+oops_ur_dead> What if we are just fooling around and not seriously roleplaying?
[17:27:48] <+oops_ur_dead> Like,
[17:27:54] * oops_ur_dead feeds Waxx to SCP-682
[17:27:56] <+oops_ur_dead> And you play along
[17:28:00] <+oops_ur_dead> Is that disallowed as well?>
[17:28:14] <@Waxx> Two or three lines is okay
[17:28:27] <@Waxx> But when we start getting into fully fledged scenarios with five different people all trying to do shit, that's where I draw the line
[17:28:57] <@Waxx> This really doesn't apply to most of you in here
[17:29:08] <@Waxx> I'm a bit disappointed that none of the said repeat offenders are in here
[17:29:14] <@Waxx> But that's on them, not me
[17:29:18] <+oops_ur_dead> Alright, thanks
[17:29:20] <+oops_ur_dead> That's all I've got
[17:29:29] <@Waxx> A good indicator for when it's getting out of hand is when people begin changing their names
[17:29:33] <@Waxx> If you have to change your name, get a room
[17:29:50] <@Waxx> Both good questions, thank you
[17:29:53] *** mode/#nuremburg [-v oops_ur_dead] by Waxx
[17:30:01] *** mode/#nuremburg [+v JohnWilliamson] by Waxx
[17:30:18] <@Waxx> Go ahead Paul
[17:30:31] <+JohnWilliamson> A comment, in regards to politics and religion
[17:31:31] <+JohnWilliamson> If a moderator or admin finds a topic or discussion to be getting out of hand, feel more than free to shunt it to my channel, #scpguntalk. Or if a discussion is overtaking the channel for a long time(what guntalk was originally meant for) and blocking out others
[17:31:55] <@Waxx> Great, thanks Paul
[17:32:05] <+JohnWilliamson> you're welcome
[17:32:10] *** mode/#nuremburg [-v JohnWilliamson] by Waxx
[17:32:13] *** mode/#nuremburg [+v Break] by Waxx
[17:32:27] <+Break> A simple question with what should be a factual, unambiguous answer:
[17:32:30] <+Break> Who -are- the new mods?
[17:32:41] <@Waxx> The only one who doesn't op himself sometimes is Sophos
[17:32:44] <@Waxx> Everyone else is up there now
[17:32:53] <+Break> Got it.
[17:33:06] <@Waxx> Most of them are people you know
[17:33:14] <@Waxx> Some are a few new faces I thought had promise
[17:33:41] <+Break> Alright.
[17:33:51] *** mode/#nuremburg [-v Break] by Waxx
[17:33:55] <@Waxx> I think Sophos has a full list
[17:34:42] <@Sophos> The new mods are: Myself, E4D, Kens, Fullforce, and Nusquam. The old guard is Bright, Clef, Gnosis, Waxx, Heiden, Imants, Unimport, Light, Mann, Raven, Beatrice, and Quik
[17:34:56] <@Waxx> Thanks Sophos
[17:35:03] <@Waxx> And now to me for the weather
[17:35:20] <@Waxx> DreadLindwyrm: I will try and update it tonight but I might forget
[17:35:22] <@Sophos> There's also Meta still as a hop
[17:35:27] <@Sophos> (half-op)
[17:35:42] <@Waxx> "it" being the chat guide
[17:35:46] <@Waxx> I have already made a few revisions to it
[17:36:04] <@Waxx> Does anyone else have anything they'd like to say or ask
[17:36:39] <@Waxx> welp
[17:36:42] <@Sophos> Ahh, forgot Ghost too
[17:36:46] <@Waxx> Ah
[17:36:57] <@Waxx> Well with that said, thank you all for taking the time to listen to my drivel
[17:36:58] <@Sophos> He's next-in-line in power to Waxx so I missed him
[17:37:02] <@Waxx> I'm going to unmoderate the chat
[17:37:11] *** mode/#nuremburg [-m] by Waxx
[17:37:14] < Beatrice> heil hitler
[17:37:15] < Beatrice> 666
[17:37:16] < oops_ur_dead> Where did anthem go?
[17:37:23] <@Waxx> I decided not to use an anthem
[17:37:26] <@Waxx> It would have been too silly
[17:37:28] < oops_ur_dead> :(
[17:37:29] <@Waxx> This is silly enough as is
[17:37:48] < Shebleha> It probably would've been amusing for the first few minutes.
[17:37:53] < oops_ur_dead> We should have things like these for the Wiki
[17:38:02] <@Waxx> The wiki isn't my purview
[17:38:07] <@Waxx> I'm technically an admin but I mostly have washed myself of it
[17:38:08] < oops_ur_dead> The wiki could use a lot of improving, IMO
[17:38:11] < Sabitsuki> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w0JqTiQPvU&feature=player_embedded
[17:38:15] < Sabitsuki> <_<
[17:38:19] <@Waxx> I figure keeping track of the chat is enough
[17:38:24] < DreadLindwyrm> So, just to check - religion, politics, excessive RP and excessive porn are bad. :D
[17:38:25] < Dexa> Well, Oops
[17:38:37] < Dexa> The only people who work on the wiki
[17:38:37] < Sabitsuki> Waxx I have a question
[17:38:39] < Dexa> are the users
[17:38:47] < oops_ur_dead> Well
[17:38:50] < oops_ur_dead> Not exactly
[17:39:01] < oops_ur_dead> I had in mind a change from Wikidot to some non-shit wiki service
[17:39:18] < Lordlyhour> so, what is the cannonocity of grapey's descisions?
[17:39:22] < oops_ur_dead> I'm sure you are all familiar with BlastYoBoots?
[17:39:32] < Lordlyhour> are they absolute or up for discussion?
[17:39:40] < Sabitsuki> wait this is better http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knMIWcJSEWY
[17:39:42] < oops_ur_dead> No?
[17:39:43] < oops_ur_dead> Fuck
[17:39:46] <@Waxx> Sabitsuki, go ahead
[17:39:55] < Imants> I am not
[17:39:57] < Nusquam> Can I say something, Waxx? After Sabit.
[17:40:00] <@Waxx> Of course
[17:40:03] < Sabitsuki> if I want to post
[17:40:06] < Sabitsuki> a safe image
[17:40:14] < Sabitsuki> but the site it is hosted on has nsfw ads
[17:40:20] < Sabitsuki> what do I tag it as
[17:40:22] <@Waxx> NSFW
[17:40:28] < Sabitsuki> okay
[17:40:32] <@Waxx> If there is anything on it NSFW, then the whole link is NSFW
[17:40:41] < DreadLindwyrm> Sounds fair.
[17:40:51] <@Waxx> A lot of people do read the chat while at work
[17:40:53] < oops_ur_dead> How about "NSFW because of ads"?
[17:41:01] < Sabitsuki> well I use mibbit
[17:41:03] <@Waxx> That's just getting too technical
[17:41:05] <@Waxx> NSFW is NSFW
[17:41:08] <@Waxx> Keep it simple
[17:41:11] < oops_ur_dead> Some people have ad blockers :P
[17:41:14] < Lordlyhour> anything on the page, on the site or in the URL? or just on the page?
[17:41:15] < Sabitsuki> which just lets you view the image without clicking the url
[17:41:19] < Sabitsuki> so
[17:41:25] <@Waxx> Anything NSFW is NSFW
[17:41:28] <@Waxx> Be it url, ad, or page itself
[17:41:31] < Beatrice> Only some people use mibbet
[17:41:40] <@Waxx> Again, lots of people do view the chat at work
[17:41:44] <@Waxx> And they use different clients
[17:41:53] < oops_ur_dead> Wait, URL?
[17:41:54] < Beatrice> I view it at school often, too
[17:42:06] <@Waxx> If the url is bigwetcocks.com then you need to tag it NSFW
[17:42:20] <@Waxx> No exceptions on this
[17:42:21] < DreadLindwyrm> XD
[17:42:28] < oops_ur_dead> What if its a site specializing in pictures of large wet chickens?
[17:42:34] < Lordlyhour> what if you are unaware the image has a possibility of being NSFW. like, you have an Chirstian boss and there is a comic which could be construed as offensive to christians. the is lunchbreak hypothesis here
[17:42:50] < Break> This is getting silly.
[17:42:52] * Nusquam waits patiently to comment.
[17:42:57] <@Waxx> You guys are getting too technical now
[17:43:00] <@Waxx> Nusquam, go ahead
[17:43:01] <@Sophos> oops: This is the sort of silliness we would like to cut down on
[17:43:10] < Break> If we can't do anything because it has the ability to potentially offend someone, we won't be able to do anything at all.
[17:43:15] < oops_ur_dead> I joke, of course
[17:43:30] < Sabitsuki> waxx
[17:43:35] < Sabitsuki> would you like this posted on the forums
[17:43:40] < Syka> what did I miss
[17:43:45] <@Waxx> I wouldn't mind that
[17:43:49] <@Waxx> Wait for it to be officially over though
[17:43:55] < Sabitsuki> ok
[17:43:57] <@Waxx> Syka, literally everything
[17:43:59] <@Waxx> Thanks for coming Syka
[17:44:01] <@Sophos> One of us will post a complete set of logs
[17:44:20] < Nusquam> Using the bot to .gis NSFW things, or things which could potentially be NSFW, is this permissible?
[17:44:25] <@Waxx> No
[17:44:31] < oops_ur_dead> One second
[17:44:33] <@Waxx> Please don't abuse grapewhistle
[17:44:36] < oops_ur_dead> I'll pastebin the entire thing
[17:44:40] <@Waxx> Using her to google image search tubgirl is bannable
[17:44:43] < DreadLindwyrm> I believe we were waiting for Nusquam???
[17:44:59] <@Waxx> If you think it'll come up NSFW, then do the search yourself
[17:45:01] <@Sophos> oops: You don't have to do it yourself
[17:45:11] <@Waxx> Accidents happen, I know, but try to use your head on this
[17:45:57] <@Waxx> Any other questions
[17:46:14] < Syka> uhh
[17:46:52] < JohnWilliamson> in regards to the "moderators have to explain their actions" thing. is this a public thing, or to be done in PM?
[17:47:17] <@Waxx> Any moderator should be able to explain his actions in public
[17:47:34] <@Waxx> This was not always the case, hence why I've made it explicitly clear here
[17:47:49] <@Waxx> This does not give you the right to berate mods any chance you get
[17:47:54] <@Waxx> But you do have the right to know why things are done
[17:48:08] < JohnWilliamson> noted
[17:48:10] < JohnWilliamson> thank you
[17:48:13] <@Waxx> Yep
[17:48:28] < Nusquam> Basically, nothing wrong with civil disagreement and discussion, right?
[17:48:41] <@Waxx> Yes, as long as it's civil and respectful
[17:48:53] <@Waxx> Abusing your right to know will result in a trip to the ditch
[17:49:03] <@Waxx> Don't ruin it for everyone
[17:49:41] < Shebleha> As always, apply Wheaton's Law.
[17:50:04] <@Waxx> Yep
[17:50:13] <@Waxx> This is irrelevant for 95% of you
[17:50:18] <@Waxx> But that 5% needs to be told, lol
[17:51:05] <@Waxx> Anyone else?
[17:51:27] < Nusquam> I'm sure I'm forgetting something but I can't remember what.
[17:51:46] <@Waxx> BTW, thank you all for actually treating this with some semblance of seriousness
[17:51:49] < Dr_Kens> Uh, not sure. Does anyone have a log I can see?
[17:51:49] < Sabitsuki> can we stop talking about 682
[17:51:53] <@Waxx> Everyone had good questions
[17:51:57] <@Waxx> Kens, it'll be posted when we're done
[17:52:03] < Dr_Kens> Alright.
[17:52:13] < Dr_Kens> Sabit: We can cut it down, but it's not going to stop.
[17:52:25] < Sabitsuki> argh
[17:52:26] < Dr_Kens> Newbies will usually be drawn to it, as it's one of the most popular articles on the site.
[17:52:28] <@Dodridge> Be advised, if anyone brings up 682 or 076, I *will* advise you of how easily they could both be killed in-universe.
[17:52:30] < Shebleha> Just like they'll never kill it.
[17:52:30] < Sabitsuki> [/charliebrown]
[17:52:38] <@Dodridge> Permanently.
[17:52:49] < DreadLindwyrm> If something does come up from this would you prefer we PM you, or ask in the channel?
[17:52:53] < Dexa> Not killed, for Able
[17:52:55] < Dr_Kens> Depends, Dread.
[17:52:58] < Nusquam> I would like to note that he's likely to mention a few methods I suggested.
[17:53:02] < Sabitsuki> I get 076, 682 and 173 have plot armour as it were
[17:53:03] < Nusquam> :P
[17:53:14] < Dexa> i would like to note that 682 would return, that's his point.
[17:53:19] < Dexa> able, on the other hand…
[17:53:33] <@Waxx> Oh, here's a thing I forgot
[17:53:35] < Dr_Kens> Dread: To answer your question, I would say usually go for PMs.
[17:53:41] <@Waxx> A lot of people keep saying we need to get more SCP discussion in site19
[17:53:55] <@Waxx> Trying to force it is dumb
[17:54:18] <@Waxx> But if someone is trying to propose an SCP or initiate discussion on one, I'd ask that you all respectfully put your side discussions on hold
[17:54:23] <@Waxx> And actually use the room for its intended purpose
[17:54:29] < Shebleha> Usually I find that whenever someone says something about a new SCP idea or something, previous conversation is usually dropped instantly.
[17:54:45] <@Waxx> It's almost never a problem
[17:54:51] <@Waxx> But I had to put it on record
[17:55:27] < Beatrice> Once in a rare while, though, I do feel like it's almost at the point where someone will say "hey, please take that to the #scpdiscussion channel"
[17:55:43] <@Waxx> hahaha
[17:55:56] < Shebleha> But… isn't #site19 /the/ SCP discussion channel?
[17:56:01] <@Waxx> That's the joke
[17:56:07] < Beatrice> thatsthejoke
[17:56:07] < Sabitsuki> that's the joke sheb
[17:56:14] < Shebleha> Oh…
[17:56:28] <@Waxx> I will say though
[17:56:35] <@Waxx> I am always impressed whenever new people join
[17:56:37] <@Dodridge> The batcave became the discussion channel for a number of writers, and others had their own channels as well for the simple reason that site19 wasn't conducive to the writing
[17:56:43] <@Waxx> Someone always takes the time to greet them and ask the questions
[17:56:45] <@Waxx> Which makes me happy
[17:57:16] < Dexa> :)
[17:57:21] < Dexa> It's my favourite thing
[17:57:23] <@Waxx> I have to get a shower
[17:57:28] <@Waxx> So I suppose we're done here
[17:57:33] < Dexa> I love to find out what new people have to bring
[17:57:35] <@Waxx> Thank you all again for taking the time to listen and ask questions
[17:57:37] < Maddy> Thanks so much Waxx.
[17:57:43] <@Waxx> If someone wants to post a log of this on the forums, please do so
[17:57:45] < Dexa> see ya waxx
[17:57:50] < Maddy> Applause for Waxx!
[17:57:53] * Maddy claps
[17:57:56] <@Waxx> f u
[17:57:59] <@Sophos> I will do it
[17:58:01] * oops_ur_dead standing ovation's
[17:58:03] <@Waxx> Cheers, Sophos
[17:58:07] < Maddy> f u too Waxx :p
[17:58:09] <@Waxx> f all u
[17:58:12] <@Waxx> u all gay
[17:58:12] < Dr_Kens> Fucking upstanding.
[17:58:15] <@Waxx> gaylords
[17:58:16] < Dexa> WARX
[17:58:20] < oops_ur_dead> lol stfu waxx
[17:58:26] <@Waxx> Okay, shower time
[17:58:27] < Dr_Kens> GAY: Genuinely Awesome Young'uns.
[17:58:29] * DreadLindwyrm gives a suitable salute. British of course…
[17:58:32] <@Waxx> The nuremburg rally is over
[17:58:33] < oops_ur_dead> u r mofo
[17:58:40] < Sabitsuki> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KpoqynjV1g&feature=related
[17:58:44] * Dexa rockety rockety
[17:58:45] < Shebleha> I think we're just getting the stupid out of our systems now.
[17:58:47] < Sabitsuki> wha
[17:58:48] < Sabitsuki> aw
[17:58:51] < Dexa> ZOOOOOOOOOM
[17:58:54] < Dr_Kens> MOFO: Marvelously Outstanding Fellow Occupant.
[17:59:18] < DreadLindwyrm> Hmmm. Perhaps an #SCP-Silly channel might be good?
[17:59:34] < Shebleha> Probably.
[17:59:42] <@Sophos> It shouldn't be necessary
[17:59:45] <@Sophos> That's the point
[18:00:54] < DreadLindwyrm> I was thinking for the just wierd stuff that gets too much for the main channel
[17:59:34] < Shebleha> Probably.
[17:59:42] <@Sophos> It shouldn't be necessary
[17:59:45] <@Sophos> That's the point
Thanks to everyone who came by, to the users of #site19, and to the mod staff of #site19. ;)
