(account deleted) 28 Jul 2017 16:04
Yaaaay they're up! We enjoyed seeing everyone's feedback this year. If you have any questions, post in this thread or PM one of us. Thanks!
2017 Community Survey Results / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» 2017 Community Survey Results
This is the discussion related to the wiki page 2017 Community Survey Results.
(account deleted) 28 Jul 2017 16:04
I don't know whether to hate Aiden more for making this a thing or you for trying to bring it onto the wiki
It's already on the wiki, fam
Unrelated: it seems our Antarctic reader has gone back to their home nation. Godspeed, penguin person.
8 other Bulgarians…
*Claps Hands*
Where are you Guys?!?
Can we get Sections 3 and 4 listed by descending number of respondents, rather than alphabetically? I can't really process this information as sorted.
The creator of any given page can be found by clicking 'history' and looking for Revision 1
You mean Revision 0.
The official reactions to the complaint about 231 are "my headcanon says it's not bad, actually". Confidence-inspiring.
Add a section where people can write stories
This is a writing site.
lmfao
if your reading this your gay
Personally, I think demonstrating how the article can interpreted differently is a pretty good way of validating 231's raison d'être.
It sure as hell beats "old articles are bad" or "that's just your opinion, man".
I'll just say I think this discussion can be had on the article's discussion page, but dismissing the feelings of a user voicing their thought via the survey so outright might not be great.
0/1 thing is fixed. As for the order listing, we have it alphabetically so that people can find a language/country easily. As for this:
The official reactions to the complaint about 231 are "my headcanon says it's not bad, actually". Confidence-inspiring.
Here's what we actually said:
It may imply this… but consider the following: http://www.scp-wiki.net/fear-alone -
LurkD
Headcanons are headcanons. I have a headcanon for Procedure 110-Montauk that has absolutely nothing to do with sexual intercourse like the article supposedly implies, and said headcanon still checks out with the facts given by the article. -
Cyantreuse
This said, unlike my comrades, I feel you on 231. The site back then thrived on shock horror though, and to a lot of users, shock horror is something they like. The only thing to do is comment on the article and downvote. -
Decibelles
So… yeah, none of us said nor implied "it's not bad". We said that the site and its users have differing headcanons on it, and then two of us used examples. So I'm not sure where you're getting that from whatsoever.
This isnt a change but i dont think the scp foundation is real but if it is i have been deeply disturbed by something u may be interested in. If thia is real please god help and have nowhere else to turn. If u can conntact me. [PHONE NUMBER REMOVED]
It's oddly amusing to see people actually believing the Foundation is real.
Also for all the whiners who called us SJWs for including more gender options in the survey (among other reasons): neener neener, we're still gonna do it next year too so too bad. Those seriously comprised at least of 100 free-form responses to the thing. Sucks for them.
If there's any overlap between them and the "I don't like the site theme" crowd, staff should change the entire site into pride flags.
As a bona fide honest-to-goodness straight American man, I, with an entire lack of irony, say the inclusivity witnessed here is not in any way, shape, or form a SJW thing, and there's so much welcome space for straight guys it's comforting.
There's just also lots of welcome space for everyone else, and we are so much better off for it.
Now, of course, this place is not welcoming to those who want other groups excluded. But that's not a sexuality or gender identity issue. That's just not welcoming assholes.
I'm amused by the people who think the site should look futuristic. I'll happily do a makeover on the site if we really want to; Cassette Futurism ftw. Courier-family fonts, old-school border styles, dithered gradients, some color tweaks… have this place looking like a proper mainframe terminal. 8D
I think it's fine and that people just have a vague idea in their head they *think* looks better than the actual site. No one design could ever make everyone happy, so there will always be some people like that.
Just uh… Popping in. On another site I frequent not naming publicly for reasons it has the option to choose between different themes. This is piggybacking on the whole "Never make everyone happy" thing. We could make a futuristic theme, but have it optional. Like, it's just a little drop down somewhere on the site that lets you change the theme. Along with this brings something nice too.
Theme Competitions!
But I'm not sure if that's possible while this is hosted on wikidot.
Oh god, I really want to tell all the kids to get off my lawn. D:
Some tiny part of me is hopeful that one of those few-hundred who found the site via "other Youtube account" found it via mine. ._.
There was something else I was going to comment on, but I forgot what it was. D: Thanks for linking to the audio adaptations thing, though! I had no idea that was there!
Language > Filipino > 23
Country > Philippines > 70
where are you guyz? ;-;
edit: i don't intend to reply on your post sir im so sorry t.t
/forum/t-3171242/2017-community-survey-results#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
