With an explanatory blurb added at the top, this would make a nice Incident Reports, Eye-witness Interviews, and Personal Logs entry.
This is an orphaned article after the most recent SCP-491 was deleted. What do?
I'd recommend to the author that he does what Leicontis said above, turn it into a standalone entry. I don't know of any particular process for things like this.
if Flah plans to do something with this, they'd best do it quick, as orphaned extra pages are usually deleted upon being pointed out.
Agreed. Although the title of the page will have to be changed as it does not actually have an SCP article to go with. My suggestion is a note saying that Foundation archeologists the site and then it was demolished as an anomalous location rather than an SCP.
You're the last one. Will you taste as good as the mayor?
I don't know. But you were definitely no suckling pig.
MAAAAAAAAAN.
That is one Hell of a way to end a tale, and it does it to a tale that's really quite good. I suspect it only has a +15 rating because it used to be a supplement, because I can't understand how something like this is so easily overlooked otherwise.
I want to read the skip this was a supplement for.
Any chance that it's still around? Like on SCP Classic or something?
The two 491's on the SCPClassic site are not the ones this references to the best of my knowledge. Shame, because I really do wanna know the context to this, even if it supposedly sucked.
bottom text