While on the surface it's similar to 140, it's different enough that I like it. Upvoted. I think Addendum 5 should be removed for breaking tone, though.
I didn't get around to posting anything more about your draft, but I like this even more than I thought I would. That said, Addendum 5 definitely needs either a rewrite or to be removed.
One question, though: Why the request for quietness near 152's containment? Only thing I can come up with is that it's a joke about being quiet in libraries; while I appreciate the stab at humor, if this is the case, the containment procedures themselves aren't the best venue.
It's not really a joke; if there's anywhere on a Foundation site where I'd expect to see a "Quiet Please" sign, this would be it. I can still remove it, if needed.
My objection is tabled.
Also, the significance of 152's image just now dawned on me. Well done.
Wow, we're getting more books, aren't we?
Also, kudos to the latest mention of Foundation historians. Nice to see the Foundation branching into the soft sciences a bit.
I like this. Book of apocalypses… the only thing missing is a log or associated Foundation tale about some of the apocalypses.
Very intriguing. I chuckled a bit when I read the remark about the last 50 being teh foundation screwing up. Upvote.
something tells me that Fred wouldn't touch this one with a 10-foot pole.
I like the "alternate timeline" sort of feeling that this SCP carries, where we don't know about all the failed timelines because we don't exist in them. But occasionally, an SCP like this comes along and documents the dooms that might have been.
Logs! This whole thing has potential for an amazing addendum.
I too would like to see a few predictions, at least two out of date ones and the 'current' depiction. Still, upvoted just for the ominousness.
Must acquire apocalypse scenarios so I can read more.
Upvoted.
I want to actually read a book like this…
Or write one…
Upvote