This article says absolutely nothing about what this item does. If it has to rely on a supplementary article for that, then something is very, very wrong.
SCP-282 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-282
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-282.
Yeah, this needs more. I feel like this has promise, but as it is right now, I feel like I'm reading a preliminary field report more than a detailed SCP report.
agreed. the incident report tells us everything we need to know, but the main article tells us nothing of interest. hopefully it can be fixed without having to give away all the info in the incident report.
I do like the full thing, but, as with the others, the article needs some information on what it does.
Admin, SCP Wiki
If I pulled a 342 and moved the log into the article, you guys think that would help?
EDIT: Righto, try this. It's longer, but look, now there's actual content there!
I like it, though perhaps this would be more appropriate as a story. On the other hand, some extremely popular SCPs are pretty much narratives in SCP format.
Edit: Forgot to add- I don't think it's always necessary that the effects of an object are put in the description. Sometimes it does make for a better page if the punch is in the supplementary info.
A lot better
using the + title in the middle of an SCP article is -really jarring- though. I very very strongly suggest you either just make it bold text, or something else.
Changed, and you're right, it looks way better now.
100 internets to anyone who can find a good picture for this.
This work? Best I got off the back of a quick google search.
I can probably find a better one when I get back to Uni.
Nah, juggling sticks are like these type of things, thanks though. :p
Why Safe/Euclid? It looks just Safe from where I'm sitting, unless it does something I'm missing if it's locked away.
/forum/t-230030/scp-282#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
