Deletions, after Mass Edit
SCP-886, the venomish suit that gave you nifty powers, deleted for -7 and Senior Staff agreement.
Admin, SCP Wiki
Deletions, after Mass Edit
Forum
» Site Announcements and Proposals / Page Announcements
» Deletions, after Mass Edit
Deleted my own, SCP-027, a Murder of Uplifted Crows, to save the admins the trouble.
/me goes off to write 100 times, "I must always present my ideas to the chat before posting."
It's not a mandatory thing. After all, it is only the chat, and an article that is deleted from a wiki page isn't inherently worse than one whose draft is rejected in chat.
Honestly, i much prefer people to just throw their ideas up.
Admin, SCP Wiki
318, -8, senior staff and author agreement. It was a rip off doppleganger.
Admin, SCP Wiki
SCP-140, squid thing, deleted due to -8, senior staff consensus
SCP-800, wine, -12
Admin, SCP Wiki
SCP-103, player piano, -13
scp-775, Magnyfying glass -7, Senior Staff agreement.
scp-789, Looney tune hole, -8 Senior Staff Agreement.
Admin, SCP Wiki
SCP-057, intelligent bomb, deleted due to -6, Senior Staff consensus.
Admin, SCP Wiki
I appear to be a bit of a death omen for poorly-rated articles. Almost every time I comment with suggestions for how an at-risk article might be saved, it gets deleted within 24 hours. Authors beware…
…not full of himself at all, is he?
Merely recognizing that my suggestions tend to be exceptionally poorly-timed. "Too little, too late," as it were. Maybe I try too hard to see potential in these articles, but it's not like the authors haven't been given lots of time, warning, and opportunity to improve them. After all, it's not like deletion kills an idea forever, though some ideas might get re-deleted no matter how they're written up. The author can always try a rewrite (and hopefully run it by chat/forums before they post, something at least one recent deletion seem to have neglected).
/forum/t-202968/deletions-after-mass-edit#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
