I welcome any suggestions for changes/editing.
Honestly? Rather damn good. I'd love to see this turned into a short film! There's the occasional moment where something doesn't quite seem to make sense, and I think I spotted a typo or two, but major editing might ruin the air of suspense - don't do anything drastic!
I am officially calling for a review of this article. Please read this and, if you are so inclined, vote on it and post your thoughts here.
if your reading this your gay
Breaks suspension of disbelief in that I just can't picture Foundation agents being this stupid. You could make a case that J.N.'s portrayal is to blame for that, but it still isn't well-written enough to overcome that problem for me.
I mean seriously. I'm not a well-trained Foundation agent and I called the ending from the second the dude picked up the diary towards the end. Even if this is a Foundation-produced schlocky morality play (which pauli suggests, but which the article does not indicate), I'd expect it to be more clever or at least more interesting or entertaining.
This article has been placed up for review. Please take the time to read, rate, and comment if you haven't already done so
This is really hard for me to read, because it's so cringe-inducing. If it was obviously trying to be farcical, and made the dialog less painful to read, then it could be something, but it doesn't, so it isn't.
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
This is an odd format, but it's endearing to me for some reason. I do like the effect of the SCP in the play-let, but yeah, the dialogue is really narmy. I wouldn't mind seeing someone do some clean-up on this.
Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.
I really fucking like this. There's nothing here that breaks my suspension of disbelief too much, in that I can see this sort of situation happening in one corner of the Foundation, and I like the plot development. I can live with the dialogue as-is, too. I want this to get more love out and about.