Fixed spelling errors, the lazy way.
I am officially calling for a review of this article. Please read this and, if you are so inclined, vote on it and post your thoughts here.
if your reading this your gay
Hope I didn't mess the review up by editing it. I changed the "sockovores" a bit- if people like what I did but still want me to take out the word, let me know, or if they just don't like the idea I guess- and also phrasing edits Kingreaper mentioned (thank you!).
Anyone prefer this version?
I like it but it doesn't really go anywhere. I think much more could be done with this concept, and would enjoy a rewrite. nevertheless upvoted.
HE HE HE
HAH
I've always liked it up until the "sockovore" part, which kind of just ruins it.
It's an old joke. "You're always missing one sock." it's an obviouse joke, but I think that's why I enjoy it. It has a certain charm to it, like a grandparent telling a joke you've heard a million times, but for good reason (I agree that the sockovore thing kinda ruins it though)
If some kind of consensus can be reached on this thing, I'd be up for "re-writing" it, which would consist of removing the sockovore part and replacing it with a punchline about every sock being a "left sock".
EDIT: It looks like Light wrote this, so I guess she can just do that if she wants to.
"including any groups of interest including the Chaos Insurgency or [DATA EXPUNGED]"
Should probably be
"including any groups of interest such as/particularly the Chaos Insurgency or [DATA EXPUNGED]"
"it appears to have a low separation threshold between other planes of existence"
Should probably be
"it appears to have a low separation threshold from/weak boundary with other planes of existence"
Overall I just don't like it. The dimension of lost socks concept is okay, but throwing the dog-like entities in harms it enough to make it a -1.