I hate the thumbs up signal for safe.
I have to agree…anything that would be a bit more appropriate?
If the updates I made to this page are acceptable to the mods and admins, I'll make similar updates to the Euclid and Keter pages. If not, then, um, never mind.
Yes, and they originally were. I randomized just so that the same twenty-odd articles weren't presented to everyone (assuming most people won't click past the first page of entries).
[Added:] I realized that we already have a list of Safe objects sorted numerically— just click the Safe tag in the left-band bar. So I'll keep this random for the sake of variety.
Given that new module thingamajigger TroyL was talking about in the complaints thread, couldn't we insert that on this page so that it listed all SCPs with the tag "Safe".
It's in the plan, yes. We're just finalizing a list of tags before we get to far into that. As it is, you can click on the left where it says Page Tags, and then click Safe for them all. I was under the impression that this list was a bank of the best examples of what made a Safe SCP.
"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato
The thing is that several newbies (and as I found out non-newbies) assume this is a list of safe SCPs and are surprised at its shortness, sometimes assuming it hasn't been updated. Would it be possible to add a link to the tagged list on this page?
THAT is an easy fix.
Examples of SAFE SCPs:
and at the end
For a complete list of SAFE SCPs click here.
Normally I'd do it myself but I'm on my way out the door and all three need doing.
It is actually just a random selection of 25 pages with the safe tag. Trying to list all the Safe SCPs would not fit on a single page.
Quik is right. I just went in and changed it to the top 25 pages with the relevant tag. That should make it clear what sort of writing and content makes for a good one, I think.
"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato