do i smell a R.U.R. reference? very nice… also corrected spelling on experiment.
SCP-010 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-010
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-010.
For a fairly decent article early on in the list, I'm surprised this doesn't have more upvotes.
It's a little sad that this article is so obscure, yet so early on the mainlist… maybe a picture will help it get the upvotes it deserves? *wink wink nudge nudge*
Tab, if you want to try to do up an image for this one (or any other article, for that matter), post 'em/upload 'em to a sandbox page and then link 'em in the article's discussion thread. 'Cos yeah, a good picture can only help (that should probably be in the guides somewhere…).
Searching around a little I found several images that could work for the collars.
I hope this help a lilttle. Collars
what quake 2 mod did you get the third one from?
At first glance it seems like such a tired idea. What elevates this SCP is Addendum 010-2. Such a small thing, but it totally changed this into something great.
I think this is the only uncensored article on the wiki (the only thing being EXPUNGED/REDACTED/BLACK BOXXED being a name, which is standared procedure for article writing)…why do we not have more like this?
if your reading this your gay
This has a partial date and one person's last name blackboxed. There are quite a few articles with low-to-no censorship, you just gotta look.
I'm placing this article up for review, it could use some more attention. Come check it out.
This would definitely need expansion if it wanted to be good, but I think the concept of something that can control people has been done better elsewhere, and this interpretation is just mediocre. Maybe if some drastic additions were made, it would be better, otherwise it's just… kinda meh.
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
I've always liked how brief this one is. It's straightforward and clear. The italics at the very end are an excellent finishing touch, and you don't see that particular style of researcher remark often.
I agree with Dex. I think that this article benefits from its simplicity and brevity, and elaborating on it would only be to its detriment.
Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.
While I agree that it doesn't need anything added, I think that the first addendum could go into the description instead.
I think there's an error, in Tests 2 and 3, they mention 10-8 when their are 7 components (the remote ,1, and the collars, 2 - 7) Was that intentional, or overlooked?
/forum/t-150816/scp-010#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
