Good stuff, son.
Could do without the part about the challah, though.
SCP-759 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-759
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-759.
Easily enough altered or removed. I had wanted to indicate that SCP-682's level of background rage was sufficient to affect the food product itself rather than merely the consumer, but that may be superfluous. I'll see if I can come up with something more appropriate.
That angry part's fine, not so much the speaking and ambulatory functions, eh.
Alternately, while 682 wants to kill every living thing, perhaps an eater of the challah wants to get rid of every delicious baked good?
I also enjoy what appears to be another take on the orgasm muffins. Very classy, eh.
Impressive experiment log! I'm gonna be wary of bread for a day or so.
do not even get me started on this…
Seriously though, good work. The concept is interesting and the execution is just great… One of the best experiment logs I have seen lately!
One nitpick I've had was the use of the word "self-termination" in the last paragraph, as it feels like a case of excessive terminitis (not to mention the fact I personally have always found this exact word rather awkward). Changed to "suicide", feel free to change it back if you really think it should be the former.
(account deleted)This experiment log is painfully unscientific and packed with lolfoundation. Part of me wants to respect the older material on the site and leave it be, but there is absolutely no way a serious organization sanctions these tests.
Actually you know what I like this.
I agree. Kalinin also makes valid points. I'm downvoting.
if your reading this your gay
I do not mind the 682 crosstest, for me it added flavor to the article. Although it could be substituted with some kind of a sociopath/psychopath, it was ok. Chuckled at the blueberry muffins part and I can't believe how little attention this one had, 13 comments… hm.
They already tried with someone that had a history of anger problems… My guess is that they wanted to try it with something else…
To quote Cave Johnson… Science isn't about WHY. It's about WHY NOT. Why is so much of our science dangerous? Why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you on the butt on the way out, because you are fired.
Why NOT do cross-testing between -682 and -759?
Because 682 and 795 might merge and become a horrible Keter-class monster than the Foundation CAN'T contain, thank you very much.
That Cave Johnson quote fits the Lolfoundation era perfectly… but the site has since grown beyond that. Cross-testing is frowned upon because it's simply too dangerous in-universe, and out of universe, it's very hard to pull off without looking silly or making it seem like you are leeching upvotes from the crosslinked article.
Even if the 682 crossover was kinda lolfoundation, I can't get "grumpy muffins" out of my head!
1+
pastarasta1 is quick-talking and often scheming
This is possibly my favorite SCP here, both in concept and the execution were incredible. I was a little iffy at first, but I quickly got hooked on it. And perhaps 759 can be used to make a sort of anti-psychotic ration/drink for agents dealing with SCPs that can affect mental state?
/forum/t-147013/scp-759#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
