Welcome to Site-23. Orientation will begin shortly. Open your-BOOOOMMMMMM! [ALARMS GO OFF] [RED LIGHTS FLASH] [Screaming begins] THE ATTACK ON SITE-23 HAS BEGUN! TO YOUR STATIONS!
I love how Sauelsuesor is basically like :o
Hello, I'm an administrator of the wiki.
I'm going to ask you please rewrite your post to include a content warning for sexuality, at the very least. We have minors who read the wiki and we age-gate articles with adult themes (read: sexual and other) and honestly, 'lewd SCP pinup pins' is in that category.
I would also like to remind you that SCP-166 is canonically in her middle teens, and therefore not of the age of majority, and would suggest you went out of your way to define the specific age she is depicted as, at the very least.
- Dexanote
I appreciate the update regarding 166.
May I request a simple "the contents of the Kickstarter are intended for 18+ participants" somewhere in your post here, preferably towards the beginning. We want the site to be covered due to our heavy, heavy underage readership and would rather not deal with potential issues.
I suggest in the future, if you run any more similar projects, that you run them by a staff member so as to avoid future issues.
Thank you for your patience,
- Dexanote
I think that turning these SCPs into pin ups completely misses the point of several of them.
Err, is 166 not a minor? https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-166 references her as to being 16, which needless to say makes this post very questionable at best and outright illegal at worst.
Who's going to tell him we're all gay?
I’m happy for the use of my article! Pitch Haven is ripe of/for sexualization (1903 in particular is meant to be sexualized to some degree, since it’s meant to capture the visceral fears/feelings of taking the first steps of transitioning), and the art for SCP-1903 is pretty great! But uh… 166 may have been a bad move, do gotta address that one.
“ Of course this was a highly problematic SCP file, and caused a stir that haunts this file to this day. And in spite of the rewrite the file got in 2020, which removed all these inappropriate details and raised her age well into the Consenting Adult range, some members of the fandom still wild-out about this character.”
She’s still 16 in the article I know you say that she’s over 20 later because it was posted in 2010 but when you say she’s well within the age of consent thats just not true… I could be giving you the benefit of the doubt in assuming that she’s 18 because you didn’t read the new article or think about why including that character in this line up was problematic. There is so so many more articles with scps that you could have included in this but why did you go for this one?