bringing it back. thanks for reading!
SCP-6453 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-6453
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-6453.
Fuckin fowl. +1
Ass Möde
You gave the wiki shit, the wiki gave you even more shit, and what did you do?
You made shitmonade.
That's my man Jock Dune alright.
(account deleted)Yeah, but what’s the point? What’s his motivation? The whole concept just seems so crude and juvenile.
Sums up my opinion on this article exactly. Scatacological humor can work if done well, but this isn't that. I actually felt nauseous by the last line.
Agreed with this. It's not clever or funny, it's just unnecessarily gory (for lack of a better term) and makes the Foundation look like morons. This is coming from someone who already knows exactly what the Bristol stool scale is and everything on it, so it's not like I'm overly squeamish about poop. Maybe if it was a -J I'd be able to take it in better spirit.
This fucking thing again? I don’t know why you thought describing the shit in the most horrible detail possible would make the shit yeti any better.
And unrelated to the shit problem, I’m very tired of articles where the O5 council are a bunch of cartoon characters doing ridiculous bullshit to appease an anomaly. I can believe the Konami code for sin, because they have a vested interest in not going to Hell. I can even buy distributing Jesus-milk around the world because it’s the only feasible means of containment. But it’s patently ridiculous that the thirteen most powerful people on the planet would pretend to like biweekly boxes of yeti shit instead of just terminating the damn shit yeti. This is like those series one self-inserts that got Xboxes in their containment chambers because you wouldn’t like them when they’re angry, but somehow even more ridiculous.
Why the needless hostility? I understand being baffled by an article on the wiki (I've been plenty of times) but this type of discussion helps nobody. The point you have is there, and hell I might even agree with it somewhat, but the way you're presenting it makes it really rough and obnoxious to listen to.
pastarasta1 is quick-talking and often scheming
I agree, my obnoxious tone is unprofessional and perhaps even rude. But it is an honest reflection of the way I feel. I can’t deny the work that went into this article - I mean damn, somebody had to research the Seven Deadly Shits - and the quality of the writing, but I find the content repugnant. I detest the use of gore (or whatever the equivalent word is in this case; my first thought was “shit porn”) for its own sake, because it’s a cheap, dirty way to force an emotional response. That was the initial source of my disgruntlement. Furthermore,
[puts on old-man-screaming-at-sky hat]
Get your pitchforks and torches ready, because I think this - if it must exist at all - ought to be a joke article. This isn’t a thing I say lightly; I was a defender of the amogus SCPs, and still am. But the only seriousness to be had in this article is the low-brow shock “horror” of the aforementioned shit porn. Everything else was the O5 council and the foundation as a whole being put through a toilet humor comedy routine. I don’t like seeing the Foundation humiliated this way, because it’s silly and (apparently mostly just in my opinion) unrealistic when taking place outside a designated silly canon like a joke article. And despite this article’s seeming attempts to the contrary (unless I’ve misread authorial intent, a real possibility) I do not sympathize with the shit yeti. It should feel bad, because it’s a degenerate shit yeti that thinks dumping boxes of shit on politicians is art. That’s groan-inducingly ridiculous. No one would laugh at or feel sorry for a human who dumps boxes of diseased shit on people’s heads.
And most of all, I’m really frustrated that nobody else seems to feel this way. It’s baffling.
tl;dr none of the intended emotional responses landed right for me, mostly because I’m not amused by shit for the sake of shit. And I’m bewildered that it’s just me.
And most of all, I’m really frustrated that nobody else seems to feel this way. It’s baffling.
You literally aren't the only one though. Literally one post above you is someone disliking it. You're getting pissed off over an imaginary shit yeti to the point you're calling it a degenerate. You should have just left the first post at something along the lines of "I find this article ridiculous to the point I'd rather it be a -J." and I would have agreed with you!
Don't want people to get out the torches and pitchforks and actually listen to you? Be respectful! Because I (and plenty others) would have listened. I understand the feeling of being baffled, trust me, but it isn't an excuse for this type of behavior.
pastarasta1 is quick-talking and often scheming
Me when the secure contain protect foundation secures contains and protects instead of killing
You can secure contain protect without making a yeti shit art exhibit.
Kothardarastrix, please keep in mind our Criticism Policy when commenting on articles. As it stands, your comment is unnecessarily harsh and vehement, and can definitely be worded in a better way to get the same point across.
You acknowledge that your tone is unprofessional/rude, and say that it is an honest representation of your feelings, but you can be honest without being rude or overly harsh.
My observation of SCP-6453 has shown that the anomaly is not only remarkably intelligent, but also appears to view the objects it molds its excrement into with a sense of pride. Its creative ambition is reminiscent of the human artist, including periods of intensive self-reflection and bursts of inspiration.
I refuse to believe this isn’t some sort of cognitohazard.
1+ for getting me to enjoy an article that includes a detailed discription of the Bristol Stool Chart
Disgusting. Hilarious.
You just made the O5s exhibit yeti shit as art.
While, as said by the others, it's a bit crude, juvenile, and in the O5's case, cartoonish, I can sincerely say that this amused me all the damn way.
Have a +1, Dune.
Goddamn this is some serious shit…
Good shit. Glad it's back. +1
/forum/t-14469961/scp-6453#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
