I'm torn here.
For one, the relationship between Fordham and Roberts feels all too real. A couple whose shared aspirations and complications dig a lot deeper than the surface. The article has a strong emotional core because of the bonds between these people, and the work that wedges them apart.
But then, their conversation takes a turn and, before the pair are able to resolve their personal differences, Fordham dies of a car crash, invoking the — if I'm not mistaken, this was a romantic relationship between two male partners, no? — Killing Your Gays trope. It's just such a case of wasted potential, and it's so unfortunate, too. The development of the couple up to that point had all been squandered.
What follows is certainly touching: The anomaly manifests as a result of both the loss Fordham experienced at the end of his life, and the unrequited feelings that carried him into death, only mending once Roberts has a heartfelt farewell. But I don't think this is enough to undo the damage caused by the invocation of that trope, whether intentional or (likely) not. I'm not sure I can reconcile this glaring hole with the well-defined character work throughout this article.