(noting I'm not a grammar wizard, nor am I the most familiar with Wondertainment)
Overall I found the article fairly engaging, though I did have a bit of trouble getting invested in the skip initially. Mainly, I feel this might be due to the lack of an 'end goal' so to speak, the skip seems content with where it's at, and doesn't really seem too interested in trying to improve or learn more about coffee making. Considering its attempts to avoid its past, and its interest in coffee, I feel showing its attempts to lean more and improve, could help a bit with audience investment (as it would allow a clearer motive, and also help to highlight the avoidance of its past).
maybe something along these lines?
"have you got [some specific ingredient], I've been looking to try and make [blank]"
"so, if I answer your questions you promise you'll give extra ingredients"
"I thought we here to discuss to coffee"
"I don't want to think about this, when I doing something that makes me happy"
As for the dialogue itself, I found some inconsistencies in the revised edit:- which I did prefer over the first set of interviews, though I would recommend you include the word associations in the finial version if you haven't already.
SCP-XXXX: Pretty sure I said I didn’t want to discuss this.
I looked further up the page, and didn't notice much beforehand indicating it didn't want to talk. The only thing I could find close to this was "SCP-XXXX remains silent".
But you’re capable of far much more
Personally I feel, "But you're capable of so much more", would fit better. "far much more" feels a bit clunky IMO.
(this only from what I've seen, there may be more but I personally couldn't find anything else)
Let me know If your interested in any further Crit :)
