I didn't think we where supposed to put items for Dungeons and Dragons here. This is the Bag of Devouring.
http://www.d20srd.org/srd/magicItems/cursedItems.htm#bagofDevouring
SCP-101 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-101
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-101.
The actual problem with "D&D items" is that they tend to be too useful, and not so creepy. Yeah, it's a bag of devouring, but it's different from that in certain subtle ways, such as mimicry. Instead of a cursed item, it's actually predatory.
However, it is very useful in getting ride of unwanted materials, so it may be something that falls under "your mileage may vary." Which is why the rating module is there. <grin>
I didn't write it, and I did upvote it, myself. Everyone's got their thoughts, and it's good to exchange them, you know?
Test this.
NO! Articles do not need more tests! Caldwell, seriously, stop.
Admin, SCP Wiki
-snip-
Jesus christ, you just don't get it do you? Tests break the whole concept of the Foundation (eg. locking things up and NOT FUCKING WITH THEM). The 682 and 914 logs are bad enough already. We do not need a page like that for every SCP. At this point, any kind of extended testing is discouraged because it's against the site tone, it takes up too much space and drops the creep factor to near-zero levels.
No, test it.
No, the Foundation fucks with SCPs all the time. That's where most of the information in the descriptions comes from: Tossing stuff at SCPs and seeing what happens. The Foundation doesn't just keep things secured, it tries to understand it. Sometimes, if the item is understood well enough, the Foundation even uses it. That's why there are so many researchers.
That said, most SCPs don't need experiment logs. Sometimes they add to the concept, like 914 or 682. Most of the time, you can just put the information in the description and be done with it.
When you dissect the frog it dies, Caldwell. Articles like 914 and 682 are special in that dissecting them a bit adds more to them, but even they have limits.
I am not asking to kill it, just explore their possibilities.
It has been tested. We know how it works. All the foundation needs to know is known. 914 and 682 are different, because part of the creep is that we dont understand them. This, as I pointed out earlier, is so easy to understand that it is found as a reasonably common cursed item in games.
Continuing to feed it seems more dangerous than educational to me. Additionally, using it as a garbage disposal that takes Class 3 personnel and a 10 minute airlock cycle just doesn't make much sense. Also, the Bag of Devouring aspect is very D&D.
Yeah, it may not seem to react, but I doubt whatever's on the end of that mouth is very pleased at being fed sewage.
(account deleted)I don't understand why D.B. Cooper needs to be in this.
Me neither. And literally dumping shit into an extra-dimensional mouth seems incredibly bonkers.
So you would not support using SCP-101 to dispose of SCP-019-2 specimens
I think it's a great idea!
Requesting consensus from other Mods/Admins to go through and strip out the Imperial measurements, since they're distracting and only rough approximations of the metric anyway. Also, may I replace that "approved by [EXPUNGED]" with O5-blackboxes? It just bugs me.
Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.
Fine by me.
if your reading this your gay
Hasn't aged well. Also, it's too useful to the SCPF, with no visible downside.
Downvote.
I still don't understand why this is Euclid and not Safe.
Would the article not refer to him as Dan Cooper? (Dan cooper being his actual alias while D.B. Cooper is a media miscommunication).
/forum/t-138383/scp-101#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
