I somewhat agree with this. I also had a problem with the redactions and titles. While it’s important to write Safe, Easily containable, non-harmful SCPs (because the probability of all anomalies being serial killers is not realistic) the redaction makes no sense. Very rarely should a lot of classified information be put into a file that doesn’t need them. The anomaly itself is uninteresting (that’s not a bad thing per say) so it should not have a lot of things interesting enough to be worthy of redaction attached to it. Redaction happens after it’s written, not before. I hope that made sense, I’m on mobile.
The titles “scp” in the usernames and emails bother me a bit because from what I know “Secure, Contain, Protect” is sorta half in-universe and half out. This confuses it with “Special Containment Procedures” which is totally in-universe. I usually put “FND” for “Foundation”.
Not enough issues to warrant a -1 but not enough to make me +1. Good luck in future projects and I hoped my crit helped.
Oh and the story I find a tad bland or cliche.
I am not an experienced reviewer don’t sue me
