interactions
This and SCP-646 should interact in some way. Does the original author have any thoughts on this?
SCP-266 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-266
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-266.
I own 646 (Birth Worm) now.
And wouldn't this article be orphaned, as it was one of Kon's?
I don't mean to be rude, but this is one hell of a necropost. The thread was started almost two years ago, I doubt that Mikeavelli is even active any more.
Dex: Check the dates before replying.
Admin, SCP Wiki
I was prepared to be disappointed by some cheap cop-out that was literally just a Will-o'-wisp, but I was pleasantly surprised in the direction taken with the article. Even so, the piece does not nearly do enough with the basic concept presented to really make it a solid piece, so downvoted.
Same here. This could be very good with expansion.
if your reading this your gay
Of all sources, however, SCP-266 prefers human contact as a method of obtaining warmth, oblivious to the inimical effect it has on mammalian life.
Wow. Tone abuse much?
-1
This article is up for review, so come read it right now or else I'll be cross with you.
I feel like this doesn't do enough. It's definitely not a bad concept, it's just executed so tersely that it falls flat. The tone also feels touchy in spots, but wasn't really a dealbreaker to me. I didn't like the last addenda at all though, felt like it went against whatever the author was building up before it and was what pushed me into a downvote. A rewrite would do tremendous good for this guy.
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
It seems that most of the older SCPs are just anamlous things. They lack a narrative, and speak more like a report.
It's good to see the staff going through these old ones, as these SCP's will give the first impression of what's a good SCP to new people. This definitely raises the bar for expectations, since we're supposed to be writing with a story in mind for an item.
And I agree with Roget's statements, -1 for now.
I feel there is very little meat to this article; it would definitely deserve some more expansion. As is, it's pretty bland.
It's adorable. For that alone, I spare it a downvote, but MC_Kejml is right. It needs much expansion, as it is bland right now.
I ran across this thanks to the random button. I thought it was kind of adorable
+1
While I like the idea of an energy being that's a heat-eater and thusly dangerous it's a little too tame for the rest of the entry. Some element of it needs to be played up more, be it the desire for interaction, the heat hunger or it's curious nature. Basically more social, more dangerous or more bizarre.
/forum/t-132994/scp-266#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
