Nicely done. Doesn't need to be indesctructible, or have the uber glove of doom, it's nifty enough with out that.
Admin, SCP Wiki
SCP-448 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-448
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-448.
It's not that it's indestructible (they apparently haven't tested fire or firearms on it) AFAICT, just very well guarded.
Alltests have proven unable to affect it, and the firearms test results in data expuinged. Yeh, it's pretty damn indestructible.
Admin, SCP Wiki
I like the glove of doom. Doesn't it make sense that if the person who approaches it is in a mood to destroy it that whatever emerges would be… rather destructive?
But it doesn't need to be able to breech bulletproof whatever.
Admin, SCP Wiki
That was my initial idea, though DrBright might have a point about its armor-piercing abilities. I'll think it over.
This is honestly my first time writing here, so I can imagine I've still got a lot to learn.
By the way, does anyone know of a SCP that's alive but has no emotions, to fill in the blank space in the "emotionless" section? I've searched through and haven't found anything, so either there isn't one or I'm not looking hard enough.
It's not needed, though it would make it feel more complete I think.
Seeing as how the object reacts to emotions I'd like to see a test administered by Dr. Gears (as had been mentioned before).
I'd also reiterate the original claims that being indestructible as overkill. Why would the Foundation try to destroy it?
Maybe they'd try to destroy it if the angry phase gets out of control in a containment breach? seems like a pretty logical answer to me.
On the data expunged at the end i imagined them shooting a missile at it and the boxing glove reflecting it by punching it back at them XD.
I had a jack-in-the-box exactly like the one in the photo when I was little. When I read the part about the music it played, it made the jangly music-box sound start playing in my head. (That one does actually play Pop Goes the Weasel.)
With author permission, I've gone ahead and changed the classification to "Safe" (author's choice) from "Safe/Euclid".
Please take a look at this article. I believe it warrants additional attention.
if your reading this your gay
A rewrite would do this one some good. The formatting bothers me, the expungements ruin it for me, and the description is simply awkward to read.
/forum/t-125473/scp-448#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
