Whether this is a standalone article or a contest entry, I can't support it.
It's not interesting. My first time reading through it, I couldn't even remember much about it, and there's nothing to keep it interesting throughout. It ends in a pretty frustrating way, with expungements that don't add, but detract from the article and I feel like whatever kind of narrative you were attempting to build (which I didn't see much of) failed. True, SCP-914 doesn't have much of a story either, but it's interesting and even outside of the test logs it's memorable.
Speaking about this as a contest entry: until I read the comments and saw what you said on IRC, I wasn't even aware this was a reimagination of SCP-914. The connection is tenuous, at best, and completely missable at worst. Even moreso, each tab has to stand on its own in order to hold its own as an entry. If one tab doesn't hold up on its own much, it's expected that the other two should. That being said, nothing except the first tab holds up much on its own. This isn't breaking rules as far as contest entries go, I'm sure, but I feel like it goes against the spirit of reimagining an skip in the first place and a quick way to fulfill requirements while not expanding much. You could have taken something uninteresting to make interesting and give it a story, but just fill it with test logs and make it boring as a result.
-1