SCP-467 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-467.

page 1 of 212next »

Dr Kondraki 01 Dec 2008 21:16

I like it, an interesting idea with an air of mystery.

arverst_aegnar 05 Dec 2011 00:03

I liked it, but it could use a re-write for tone.

(account deleted) 31 Oct 2012 14:11

I'm confused…The "Incident Report" mentions the question of how people might "lie" to themselves; does that mean that the "confessions" heard over the phones (or whatever) are untrue?

Ob1Kn00b 05 Dec 2012 08:28

The consistent redactions around anything potentially interesting in the test logs killed this for me.

Jabal 03 Jan 2013 18:10

Great concept that i would like to see expounded upon.

DrGray 16 May 2013 19:04

Does anyone else get the feeling that right's 2nd call with the child is 231?

Well, +1 regardless.

EFS19 - MC_Kejml 04 Jan 2014 22:20

I thought of a child that Rights couldn't have. I had personally connected (possible) 231 to the amnesiaced dude.

EFS19 - MC_Kejml 04 Jan 2014 22:18

A interesting idea with some old residue from the Classical Foundation, it seems. I like it.

A12 03 Mar 2015 13:52

Not bad but it seems the most interesting stuff has had large [REDACTED] portions inserted. I'd like to see a little more creative redaction, like if the incident had to do with a person breaking down and trying to set fire to the box have the portion after the redacted section stating an update to the SCP to prevent people bringing lighters in or whatever. Just a little more info on the specifics and this one will be good ^^

Sound Chaser 31 May 2015 19:44

Ehhh. The concept to this is vaguely interesting, although I get the feeling I've seen it elsewhere. However, the article goes basically nowhere with it; the entries themselves are pretty uninteresting, with maybe one or two notwithstanding, and the Senior Staff Avatars are totally extraneous. Like, if it were trying to build characterisation for them, fine, but this just namedrops them and redacts the entries. Also, the tone is exuding definite 2008 vibes. Again, I feel like this could be taken somewhere pretty decent, but as-is, downvote.

Zmax15 27 Jun 2015 04:46

I'm double on that. A rewrite is pretty necessary with the tone it's working out. Unfortunately I feel that's not going to happen with the age of the article, anyone will ought to get on this one.

Assuming that's not blasphemy to say. I'm assuming it isn't.

Jim North 25 Aug 2015 05:34

Man, I really like the idea of this one, and there are several sections of it that I like, but there's too much stuff redacted where the redactions don't actually add any mystery, just confusion and a little annoyance. Downvoting with a hope for at least a moderate amount of rewriting.

page 1 of 212next »