So here's my take on this:
All of SCP-2622's stories are complete lies. He is, however, still a mole person.
If this guy's supposed to be legitimate, I'll probably neutral vote, seeing how many other former species have claims to prior dominance over the Earth, and at least one other non-human explorer of the Earth. If this is a hoax with no legitimate explanation for how the guy is what he is (since his story sounds like such bullshit), I have to upvote at that point, because what the fuck.
See my above reply to DreamwalkerFae if you're interested in the real explanation.
At first, I was a bit thrown off by this, but the more I read, the more I enjoyed this. It kind of reminds me of Lord Blackwall, but is different enough to work.
He is supposed to be a kind of "mole man" right?
Yeah, he's intended to be a humanoid star-nosed mole.
I'm going to be honest here and admit that at first I was "Oh, mole people inhabiting Earth before humans, how original", but once I realized he was basically bullshitting his entire story, I just had to upvote.
I like that he's gradually revealed to be lying about everything, but more than that I like that he was discovered while ambling around the London Underground system. (As you don't mention any TfL staff involvement, I like to think anomalies are so often found wandering aimlessly around the Tube network that the Foundation now carries out routine sweeps there…) +1 for sheer fun weirdness.
Edit: didn't read the Addendum properly. If I could, I'd +1 again for the facsimiles of military medals - nice little emotional touch without being overly sentimental, good work.
I love the old exploration fiction; you had me at molemen.
It's the Mole People. A-and it… works. Somehow. Just one nitpick:
with an affected English accent
Which one? Are you thinking "standard", which would be a Received Pronunciation accent?
It has an obviously faked British accent that it refuses to stop speaking in, so I'm not sure that I can adequately answer "what accent is it?". The SCP itself probably doesn't know.
Hmm. I'd say call it "muddled" then, but someone else might come up with a "more clinical" equivalent.
Absolutely love this. Can't help but wonder where the heck this guy actually came from.