Sexy ;)
SCP-347 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-347
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-347.
In terms of "things you want to say", neither "creepy references to a desire to fuck a fictional character as your only comment on the character's existence" nor "a reply to a seven-year-old post" are good boxes to be checking. Don't make posts like this in the future.
I noticed the suggestion for introducing it to other human SCPs; is there anyone in particular that could be used to fit that bill?
- SCP-343 could actually be used as a sort of psychiatrist, but it seems that it would be 347 visiting it instead of the other way around. I assume that constant moving of an invisible person would be a bit of a hassle.
- SCP-507 would probably petition for a meeting itself if told about 347, but is somewhat eccentric and would have to remember to leave its little pop-gun outside while visiting. There would also be the possibility of large complications if meetings are not restricted to the "safe" time periods.
- SCP-105 and SCP-808 are apparently being set up for a meeting already.
- SCP-073 doesn't seem like too bad of a choice if it has free time. Not the most emotive, but not bad.
- SCP-076-2 is, well, 076-2.
- SCP-083 Would probably be a bad choice. For various reasons.
(account deleted)I don't know why, but this reminds me of Invisible Man.
…The book, not the other stuff.
What happens if you, say, pour water over her, or apply makeup or facepaint to her? Does she become visible?
She does. Only herself is invisible, as well as anything that she closes her orfaces around. So like stuff that goes in her mouth is invisible and whatnot.
Here's a really tacky and gross and creepy question (but, all things considered, the Foundation concerns itself with stuff that's a lot grosser and creepier on a daily basis).
Tampons.
Is a tampon 'invisible' when she's using it? Does that count as "closing an orifice around (the tampon)" ?
Sure, I don't see why it wouldn't- her body is completely enclosed around it, right?
I'm actually extremely curious as to what would happen in the event of an invisible pregnancy.
Someone being hurt real bad by Dr. Rights.
That, and the medical team in charge of the baby's birth would have to wear FLIR goggles to make sure the pregnancy goes correctly (If a C-Section is needed, then they're fucked).
This is one of my favorite articles.
I'm surprised they don't offer her more freedom if they offer to "lojack" her - either locking ankle bracelet and/or inserted RFID chip.
….The fact that I did not realize this earlier makes me really, really dumb. YOU ARE A GENIUS SIR.
Not really - these are "timeless" articles. If this was pre-1990 they might have come up with the tech just for her.
Besides which, they kind of didn't want her sneaking off into a closet to sex someone up…
Perhaps the Foundation would tattoo her prominently if they didn't have access to RFID or anything.
if your reading this your gay
/forum/t-107867/scp-347#post-
page revision: 2, last edited: 15 Jan 2023 15:06
