I don't get it
would you read it/explain it to me ples?
There's an article about the phenomenon on Wikipedia.
M = |M_{1}|e^{i\theta_{1}}e^{i\phi_{1}} + |M_{2}|e^{i\theta_{2}}e^{i\phi_{2}}\tilde{M} = |M_{1}|e^{i\theta_{1}}e^{-i\phi_{1}} + |M_{2}|e^{i\theta_{2}}e^{-i\phi_{2}}
… would you read it/explain it to me pleeeees?
Matter is being converted every two weeks to anti-matter, and back again. Apparently, the Doctor who was 'annihilated' was retroactively removed from existence. But it seems to have been kinda hap-hazard, as memories of him readily exist, and you can refer to him. It's just, everything he ever did personally has been undone on some level.
This is worse than him just being entirely removed retroactively. If he were entirely removed, reality would've changed to fit his absence. But it hasn't. There are gaps forming in reality and paradoxes building up over time because it's happening to others as well.
My take from this is that he wasn't retroactively removed, but rather everything he directly created was converted out-of-phase just like he was. So, ink in anything he wrote, bytes in any files he created, etc. And then poof, and it's all gone.
It looks like you've done your research really well, and I know enough about antimatter for the twist near the end to make sense and be kind of a cool hook, but…most of the text of the article is so in-depth that I just glaze over while reading it. Unfortunately, I can't think of a good way to fix this (and retain the article's integrity.)
Upvoted despite begrudgingly reading through a physics lesson. The hook was worth it, and I think I learned something.
Impressive.
Not nearly as good as 1718, partly because I imagine a background in particle physics is what you need for this one to truly work (the gradual realization of the punchline yourself, if you will) but it's still a great article.
I'd say, don't change a thing. This is and will be a niche article, but it's a very good one.
Actually, if it helps, I know next to jack about particle physics and I was still starting to get it by the time the addendum handed it to me. It helped that I knew about matter/antimatter asymmetry, though.
Yeah, like what everyone else has said, I'm just too uninformed about particle physics to understand most of this. I think I still managed to understand this for the most part, tho.
It's a cool thought, a YK-Scenario happens bi-weekly. But I feel that the last note was kind-of hanging of the edge of "believable" and "un-believable". I may be missing something, since I don't understand a lot of physics. Writing is good, tone, spelling and the rest is fantastic, so is the idea, but the last note felt a bit abrupt.
Sorry, but no-vote. May be liable to change.
(account deleted)650mSv
Thank you for knowing the difference between dose and exposure
Thank you for knowing the difference between dose and exposure
Thank you for knowing the difference between dose and exposure
Thank you for knowing the difference between dose and exposure
[REDACTED, SEE ADDENDUM 2123-ALPHA, LEVEL 4 CLEARANCE REQUIRED]
This should be a semicolon after REDACTED tho
In fact, though that would cut it, I'd change it to
[REDACTED; SEE ADDENDUM 2123-ALPHA (LEVEL 4 CLEARANCE REQUIRED)]
There are multiple spots where you forgot to replace their SCP Designation placeholder (instead of 2123, it says "y"). However, I like the detail you put in with the collapsibles. Adds to my immersion. +1
I barely understand it, but the tone is spot-on throughout, and the science appears to be well-researched. The stuff about the site being deserted and the FHI employees all having disappeared was suitably creepy. +1!
