Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »

strange to think -j's used to be mainlisters

by Jack EveredsJack Evereds, 22 Nov 2017 16:47
Re: Staff Post - Deletion Vote by MrWrongMrWrong, 22 Nov 2017 16:40

This reminds me a little bit of SCP-2610, but I loved SCP-2610.

+1

by not_a_seagullnot_a_seagull, 22 Nov 2017 16:38
Re: Staff Post - Deletion Vote by MrWrongMrWrong, 22 Nov 2017 16:36

P.S.! No idea how to make those little boxes around text with the dotted borders and the slightly darker background. Yaknow what I'm talking about?

Do this:

> Your text here.

Feedback over, good luck!

Re: First Shot in Forever by LeveritasLeveritas, 22 Nov 2017 16:33

Just to let you know: Signing your posts is generally frowned upon in the forums. It's simply unnecessary since we can see who posted what.

if you write an SCP with the MTF and it sticks around, you can add it to the list.

Giving clarification on the issue.

If you're referring to MTF guide, I will not recommend addition until there are multiple articles by multiple authors that use the MTF. And even so, it should be done by requesting staff to include them (not by doing it yourself, since that is editting a site guide).

If you're referring to the unofficial compilation of MTFs, yes. Add when the article exists and will last.

Staff Post - Open by MrWrongMrWrong, 22 Nov 2017 16:25

You know you're doing something right when you can accurately visualize something without a picture.

+1

by Lord_of_LaughLord_of_Laugh, 22 Nov 2017 16:24

Let's take a look at this, author.

Feedback over, good luck!

I'll also point out that there's no submission process for MTFs- if you write an SCP with the MTF and it sticks around, you can add it to the list.

Let's take a look at this, author.

Feedback over, good luck!

Re: SCP-3284 Draft by LeveritasLeveritas, 22 Nov 2017 16:07

Hello there. It's me again, here to critique your draft a second time.

Think about what kind of narrative direction you have in mind for this along with how you want your readers to feel when they read your article. This will be of great help in writing a cohesive and overall enjoyable SCP.

In the meantime, I'll also link this essay on Beethoven and pianos as reference. You might like to give it a read.

I hope this helped. Best of luck!

Re: SCP-XXXX; Retry by MendelssohnMendelssohn, 22 Nov 2017 15:53

Milk. And then white. And I like dark the least, although it's still chocolate so it's still good.

Re: @DarkStuff by DarkStuffDarkStuff, 22 Nov 2017 15:51

Thank you for your response. To be honest my SCP was a puppet to begin with so that's where I got the concept from. Maybe I should come up with a complex backstory to the anomaly, maybe she was a performer at a Bunraku theatre and got cursed, Its hard to come up with an idea that makes sense without sounding magical. Also should I remove the multiple personality idea completely or just make the several personalities as a ruse to attract people? ~ Jason


-BigJasonMac

Same. What is this, a prank by SCP-732?

by explaintheparadoxexplaintheparadox, 22 Nov 2017 15:46

I love this one. I like anomalous activity with consistency, and i actually like the lack of a true resolution or explanation. + 1 for me.

I know it has no inherent connection to Kirk Lonwood High,or any of the other items, but should this have the Class of 76 tag? It has the year and the school setting.

Class of 76? by Toa_VineToa_Vine, 22 Nov 2017 15:42
AyasonAyason 22 Nov 2017 15:41
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-3365

I second this - not necessarily a link, but some form of investigation into the fate of the skeletons and/or the creation of the SCP.

by AyasonAyason, 22 Nov 2017 15:41

I require an explanation

by taylor_itkintaylor_itkin, 22 Nov 2017 15:40

I agree.

If this was attached as addenda to an SCP in would greatly increase the effectiveness of both articles.

by Lord_of_LaughLord_of_Laugh, 22 Nov 2017 15:37
page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License