Sorry man, but this is a load of bong. You tell me anywhere else in the SCP archives where Greys are mentioned. You make it seem like Greys are considered entirely normal, and don't even answer most of the normal SCP questions.
The picture doesn't really fit the description, though.
If this ever gets deleted, we oughta keep the pic.
Why do her requests need to be filled immediately and without question? And why are you terminated for merely looking at her wrong?
And what the hell is a "grey"?
I think we need to decomission this. Senior Staff, do you agree?
Admin, SCP Wiki
Alternatively, rework it to reference something genuinely creepy, like the Black Eyed Kids urban legend. Maybe find a way to work in the picture on this page.
I think we should rework it, simply to keep that picture, but if that isn't possible, then get rid of it. We've never made mention of aliens or any kind of their ilk before, and personally, I don't think we should.
I think Iceberg hasn't had a decomm yet.
Admin, SCP Wiki
Must…re-write…SCP…
I saved the picture. Can this number be purged so I can reclaim it and start the vote counter at 0?
Edit: Nevermind, I'll rewrite it and PM the voters since they're still around.
I'm going to vote against decommission on this one.
Remove the Grey references, and I don't see why this one is so objectionable.
I think we're better off saving the pic and restrting from scratch. I can't find anything redeemable about the article itself.
I say we scrap most of it, but keep the picture and basically make it SOMEWHAT similar (ie still a creepy child). Because if we don't, Bihjan's FPS plot is bricked.
The pic is useful. The alien references, not so much. Perhaps the eyes are indeed the windows to the soul, and a re-written version of this SCP is merely wearing a child-suit. The black eyes reflect the real subject.