SCP-134 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-134.

page 1 of 41234next »

DrakeRunner 20 Aug 2008 03:31

Sorry man, but this is a load of bong. You tell me anywhere else in the SCP archives where Greys are mentioned. You make it seem like Greys are considered entirely normal, and don't even answer most of the normal SCP questions.

Oh Boy...

Eremus 13 Oct 2008 16:18

An uncreative SCP based on vague writing and common cliché lore.

Arcibi 13 Oct 2008 20:08

Sorry to say, this one seems kind of boring

Or at least it would, if it weren't for the image

That picture is hell of creepy and probably saves the whole thing from being too dumb

Yubi Shines 08 Feb 2009 01:16

The picture doesn't really fit the description, though.

Xewleer 16 Feb 2009 03:58

I just fulfilled my holy s*** quotient for today. That picture is CREEPY!!!

Agent Circeus 16 Feb 2009 04:13

If this ever gets deleted, we oughta keep the pic.

Sir Viking 15 Mar 2009 09:30

Why do her requests need to be filled immediately and without question? And why are you terminated for merely looking at her wrong?
And what the hell is a "grey"?

AdminBright 15 Mar 2009 16:08

I think we need to decomission this. Senior Staff, do you agree?

---

Admin, SCP Wiki

Re:

Ekzentric Lohner 15 Mar 2009 16:28

Alternatively, rework it to reference something genuinely creepy, like the Black Eyed Kids urban legend. Maybe find a way to work in the picture on this page.

Re:

Kain Pathos Crow 15 Mar 2009 17:17

I think we should rework it, simply to keep that picture, but if that isn't possible, then get rid of it. We've never made mention of aliens or any kind of their ilk before, and personally, I don't think we should.

Re:

AdminBright 15 Mar 2009 17:39

I think Iceberg hasn't had a decomm yet.

---

Admin, SCP Wiki

NekoChris 19 Mar 2009 23:42

Must…re-write…SCP…

I saved the picture. Can this number be purged so I can reclaim it and start the vote counter at 0?

Edit: Nevermind, I'll rewrite it and PM the voters since they're still around.

Last edited on 19 Mar 2009 23:48 by NekoChris Show more

Dr Kondraki 23 Mar 2009 15:51

I'm going to vote against decommission on this one.

Remove the Grey references, and I don't see why this one is so objectionable.

Re:

SpoonOfEvil 03 Apr 2009 23:57

I think we're better off saving the pic and restrting from scratch. I can't find anything redeemable about the article itself.

Re:

Dr Grangan 04 Apr 2009 00:00

I say we scrap most of it, but keep the picture and basically make it SOMEWHAT similar (ie still a creepy child). Because if we don't, Bihjan's FPS plot is bricked.

Re:

Mulciber 04 Apr 2009 01:08

The pic is useful. The alien references, not so much. Perhaps the eyes are indeed the windows to the soul, and a re-written version of this SCP is merely wearing a child-suit. The black eyes reflect the real subject.

page 1 of 41234next »