They're cool! However we should make them all one size.
Warning Labels / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» Warning Labels
This is the discussion related to the wiki page Warning Labels.
Some of those look a little crude. The first 3 are pixellated.
Dude, nobody found out that every SCP letter in the page was misspelled as SPC. Sentucky Pried Chicken anyone?
Why is this page still linked from the Main List? I thought the idea of using standardized warning labels was pretty much abandoned.
It'd be a neat idea if they were rather small and unobtrusive, like maybe 60 pixels squared, and relied entirely on a quick, recognizable symbol rather than than both the image and the explanation. Like, a bank of three symbols that quickly explain most SCPs.
"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato
It's fun to keep around as a bit of site history, but honestly, no, it's not necessary.
"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato
Is there any way to display these warning labels on individual SCP pages?
Update: Does 'no longer in use' mean 'no longer in use in-universe'? Was wondering if we could still use them if we wanted :)
So, at one point these were actually used then correct?
These do not line up at all. Makes the page hard to look at.
Why don't we use this? It seems like a cool idea.
I think it's mainly because we want to allow for creative freedom. Things like this look like they should be standardized in-universe, meaning that it would become an un-written rule for some users to include them, including when voting for other articles.
Oh, I see
But I could put it in my article if I want to?
There's no rule against it, but signs like these are meant to be on walls, not documentation. It's unnecessary in-universe, and people might call you out on that.
/forum/t-77280/warning-labels#post-
page revision: 1, last edited: 25 Feb 2021 03:57
