Experiment Log 316 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page Experiment Log 316.

BlastYoBoots 31 Mar 2010 20:29

Any guest supervisors feel like running more tests for this log? Feel free to do so; seeing Dr. Blast whining for five more entries straight will get old fast.

picklejuice 03 Nov 2010 02:44

Log file seems to reference several SCP that are no longer dangerous SCPs. Downvoted.

Dr Grim 03 Nov 2010 22:55

…Which one isn't dangerous? Mr. Deeds, I suppose, but still. Besides which, there's nothing that says we need to test it on dangerous SCPs only, so I don't see a problem. Upvoted.

Photosynthetic 04 Nov 2010 16:24

Danger is not a requisite quality of a good SCP. It often helps, but isn't by any means required.

---

SCP Wiki Administrator | Earth: We're all in this together.

Voct 31 Aug 2011 12:53

Upvoted for corrupt Mister Deeds.

The Able test is a good indicator of why we shouldn't try this on 682, though.

Icalasari 31 May 2014 06:32

I loved the riots in Italy part

Blast

MCHesh 09 Sep 2014 05:29

This has Blast written all over it, literally. 15 times to be exact SCP-316 13 times. I liked the article but constantly seeing what is basically the writers name over and over again I lost immersion.

Monochrome Kanon 15 Nov 2014 04:09

Upvoted because "Dr. Blast" is such a cheesy nick name I can't help but like it.

Doctor Kayak 14 Oct 2015 13:27

Honestly can't decide if I like the Dr. Blast notes. On one side they're humorous, yes, but on the other hand, they're really annoying.

Oldlongfellow 08 Sep 2016 23:14

They don't really add to the SCP, and the *humor* isn't really that funny.