I find myself upvoting, partially due to the reference.
Admin, SCP Wiki
SCP-669 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-669
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-669.
D'you think I should add an explicit link to SCP-627?
I want to add a note about it being a bad idea to swallow the object, but I'm not sure how to word it for maximum effect.
Experimentation with this SCP requires approval from at least two O5-level personnel.
This is pretty excessive. Also, there's nothing about this article that interests me.
Art blog | Personal/political blog | I'm un-retired from the SCP community. Go check out Regicide, my Homestuck fanfic, too. | Death to America.
Hmmmm….I know I already opened myself up to SCP-100, but I have an idea for this. If it gets low enough for deletion, permission to rewrite?
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
I've written a tale upvoted by Djoric, Bright, Echo, Yoric, Moose, VAE and Voct, fite me irl if you don't respect
Hm, i'd like to have a try at this one too - I had an idea involving this one being a malfunctioning model of an electron from a rutherfordian atom model.
This things been languishing in my sandbox, so go ahead.
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
I've written a tale upvoted by Djoric, Bright, Echo, Yoric, Moose, VAE and Voct, fite me irl if you don't respect
Nice work! I really like how you took the original concept and put it to the next level without actually changing it all that much. I would never have come up with the macro-particle idea.
I like this about as much as I liked the old one. That is a compliment.+1.
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
I've written a tale upvoted by Djoric, Bright, Echo, Yoric, Moose, VAE and Voct, fite me irl if you don't respect
/forum/t-152168/scp-669#post-
page revision: 0, last edited: 05 Dec 2015 04:09
