Rose 1:
A bit of a format screw, the story will be told from screenshots and bits and pieces of messages from throughout the internet starting with SCP foundation official messages and articles to facebook group messages, 4chan image threads where fake and real leaks are being spammed everywhere to reddit posts and the like to show what the world looks like and how people from all walks of life deal with the situation.
This is a super interesting conceptual framing of your tale. It makes me think of the Parawatch format and that gets me excited to see how you do it! What I have worries about is the design and coding that will be required to pull this off effectively. Do you know how to use the wiki syntax or web design in order to make these different pieces or will you be needing help with doing that? Either is fine, I'm just trying to make you think of realistically what it would take to pull this off and make you consider how you could do it effectively without driving yourself goofy.
Rose 2:
Set in the broken Masquerade canon, the SCP foundation restores the veil by turning the foundation, all the SCPS within, researchers staff members MTFs everything the whole idea of the SCP foundation into an anti-meme
This is a really cool idea! I am actually really interested in this and honestly a little envious that I didn't come up with this first :P What I am still needing from you, though, is to know what this antimemetic property is exactly and how it will be shown through your described layout above. Antimemes are hard to get right and you will be turning the entirety of the Foundation into one that works on the entire world. So I want to understand more of what you are trying to do.
Thorn 1:
via a 'technology' but this plan is leaked to the public and chaos ensues.
These are important parts of your tale, in my perspective, and I need to know what they mean. A typical SCP article could focus on more of the antimemetic properties and such, but a tale usually wants a little more about the world and experience of the event. So having a good foundation of the idea of the technology they use and the source of the leak and the "chaos" that follows will be important for you to know as the author (even if you don't include it all in the actual tale). Can you tell me a little bit more about these pieces?
Rose 3:
The tale will begin with a unanimous vote by the O5 council to enact this protocol and some worried discussion amongst researchers about the logistics of this plan and how it would all even work but the Foundation sees it as their last resort to restoring their mission.
I am a SUCKER for detail and worldbuilding. Starting the article with this discussion by the O5s sounds like a fantastic place to start your article. But there are some thorns embedded in this idea that are growing out of the rose itself. You have presented a world in itself here that builds out of a world that you will have to give us as factual. To make me nod along to this part of your tale, I need to have been taught a few things first:
Lesson 1: The Foundation's mission. It appears that, in your cannon, the Foundation's goal will continue to act in the shadows after the Veil is broken. This is specific to your view of the Foundation so I will need to be shown that somehow. And
Lesson 2: If this is their last resort to achieving going back into the Veil, then what else have they tried and why would they make this their last resort? Why is this the place where they draw the line?
Bud 1:
The plan is leaked on 4chan amongst other leaks all of which are ridiculous and fake except for this one which will have sources of some kind.
Have you read any of the QAnon conspiracy theories or are you familiar with it at all? QAnon is like a "real life" version of what you are describing and earned "credibility" by claiming to be a government insider. This might be something worth diving into before writing your tale to get the experience right and could build you up a really interesting commentary in your article on real life events.
Rose 4:
The media begins to report on it and the general public goes into chaos over their impending amnesticizing, facebook karens selling anti-anti-meme essential oils, reddit users saying that its all fake and etc,
I love this and think it will be super fun and comedic. I have nothing more to say than that I love this.
Bud 2:
at the current moment I don't really know how to end it perhaps I could leave it up to the reader to decide if the plan was successful maybe the plan was successful but some unforeseen consequences happened? I really don't know
I really do not think that this is the direction you should go in. You are presenting a really cool event in the Broken Masquerade cannon and I think leaving it without a solid conclusion would be a grand disservice to your idea, your writing, and the wiki itself. Before I would greenlight I would want to see what you are considering for your ending and how you think it could end. This does not lock you in to any one path, but it is important to have a goal so that I can help you reach towards it. In my personal opinion, I think that you have three big directions that would shift the narrative:
Possibility 1: The Foundation succeeds. In this direction I think your narrative would shift into a story of the greater good and the reasons of why secrecy is more important than knowledge of the general public. I would want to understand more in your writing of why the Foundation persists even after there is so much public backlash. My imagination of this ending has like the O5 council speaking on talk shows and addressing the UN. This is an ending that takes a stand on ethics and politics of the Foundation's mission.
Possibility 2: The Foundation fails. In this direction I think your narrative would have to explore the lessons I outlined above in heavy detail of why the Foundation believes that the Veil is so important and what the consequences are of persisting without the Veil. If the Foundation fails, then those consequences should be explored and realized.
Possibility 3: The Foundation stops itself. In this direction I think your narrative would have to explore the human element of the Foundation and the researchers that are objecting to the O5 council's decision. This is an exploration of the humanity of the Veil and the humanity of the world where monsters roam free. Do people deserve to know what lives in the dark? Is it their right to know what goes on at the Foundation? Does the Foundation get held accountable? etc.
