The concept:
Elevator Pitch: A clear bottle of therapeutics full of distinct pills, all colors having a particular effect on life. The vessel is wrapped in a crumpled, shabby piece of paper that reads in a scribbled, messy fashion: "VAROVAINEN JA VIISAS" (Careful and Wise in English.) The canister possesses fifty-three pills. The following list reads what each colored pill can do to someone:
Collapsible
·Red- Subject immediately falls down and dies.
·Orange- Subject loses eyesight for 30 minutes
·Light Blue- Subject loses balance and hearing, becomes color blind, gets confused for an hour
·Dark Blue- Subject cries uncontrollably and becomes mute
·Yellow- Subject screams out of agony, shortly dies after the pill is consumed.
·Violet- Subject falls asleep for years.
·Lime Green- Subject’s eye veins extends to the front of the eye after a while suffers gangrene and dies shortly later
There are eight red pills, twelve orange pills, six light-blue pills, seven dark-blue pills, seven yellow pills, six violet pills, and seven lime-green pills.
Overall, this feels like a "thing that does a thing" (at least to me). As I'm not given much insight into what its purpose could be, why the colour of the pills matter, why the name is important and how the Foundation interacts with it as a whole. Currently The idea feels fairly flat and bare bones due to the effects taking being at the forefront of the idea. -What about this concept give it an edge, what sets it apart from the likes of other medicine related skips? what makes me as reader care about it?
There isn't much here that really grabs my attention, or keeps it for that matter, as the effects (which the pitch and narrative seem to rely on) themselves are fairly overused/cliched imo. In the context of this pitch, They come off as a way to 'raise the stakes' in order to keep audience attention. The pitch doesn't really have much else going for it, which makes the whole "it kills you part", feel like the main focus/attention drawer.
The narrative:
Central Narrative: SCP-XXXX was detected in a small, isolated cabin in the north-western region of Nunavut on the third story of a wooden bookshelf in early 200█. The bookshelf had nothing on it other than the medicine. Beside the ledge, lied a middle-aged man. The police attempted to wake the man up, but the attempt failed. The previous owner of the cabin at the time departed from Nunavut before SCP-XXXX was found by law enforcement. The corpse was examined, and so was the can of pills. The man's veins had shown clear traces of narcotics and medication. It was eventually learned that the traces of narcotics in the man were the same chemicals the capsules possessed. The police finally concluded that the male died of a drug overdose from SCP-XXXX, two days after the cadaver and cloaked bottle were found. SCP-XXXX was then taken away by the police.
The narrative itself doesn't feel like much of story imo, it sounds closer to that of a discovery log. There isn't much of a resolution or middle act, there only really seems to be a setup. The lack of a strong conflict is also a concern of mine, as the story doesn't build up to anything, it more so feels like a series of events at the moment. -Do note that ongoing attempts to contain something isn't a strong enough conflict to carry the article.
I'm unsure of where the Foundation is in all of this, as they don't seem to be mentioned at all, its anomalous effects aren't really even discovered (its only taken into police custody). Considering they are the ones writing the article, I would imagine that they found out about the skip, found a reason to test it… tested it, and then write out what they learnt from it, and how it will be kept ect. ect. -The current story doesn't seem to include these events whatsoever, which makes the story unfinished.
Overall, the narrative didn't keep my attention as there wasn't much of a tone. The characters themselves and/or the skip didn't make me question or feel anything, which makes the story/article as a whole feel a little bland. I Would recommend you try start to think about how you want the audience to feel by the end of the article, and how you would go about conveying that emotion.- Its much easier to keep engagement and attention, when the audience becomes emotionally invested in the article.
Hook:
Hook/Attention-Grabber: Although the man took the medicine, there were no fingerprints or marks indicating that the man touched it. There were also no found marks or fingerprints on the man that didn't come from his DNA. The man did not wear gloves, nor were there any gloves in the cabin This discovery warranted the police to search throughout Nunavut to find the culprit. The search for the offender has not yet concluded, nor has there been any progress since the investigation began.
This doesn't really grab my attention, I'm not getting any other insight into the skip or any possible origins/purposes. It more or less feels like there is an extra 'mystery' being added in to keep attention on a fairly underwhelming concept. Why is this important? how does this part specifically fit in wit the rest of the skip?
Red or green?
Due to my afore mentioned concerns, no Greenlight. -I would recommend you expand on the skip more in general, try looking at a possible origin (do note that it doesn't need to be super detailed, subtly can work well), an inherent purpose, strong interactions with the Foundation and more compelling effects, that don't rely on killing to be interesting. As for the narrative, I would like to see more on how it was found by the Foundation, why it was tested and what was learnt from it. This sounds like the beginnings of something fairly strong, I look forward to seeing future renditions.
If you would like me to give this (or any concept) further advice/feedback, then feel welcome to shoot me a PM or ask via IRC. response times generally range from 2-12 hours over PMs. If your looking for additional critiques in general, then I couldn't recommend the Butterfly squad more:)